Response rate. All three Principal Range States identified in the Action Plan responded to the questionnaire (100%). Response received AEWA CP Morocco Yes Syria Yes Turkey No
Response rate. All four of Principal Range States (100%) identified in the Management Plan responded to the questionnaire. Response received AEWA CP Belgium Yes Denmark Yes Netherlands Yes Norway Yes
Response rate. Three of the four Principal Range States identified in the Action Plan responded to the questionnaire (75%). Response received AEWA CP No response received by the deadline AEWA CP Iceland Yes Greenland No Ireland Yes UK Yes
Response rate. All five Principal Range States identified in the Action Plan responded to the questionnaire (100%). Response received AEWA CP Bulgaria Yes Kazakhstan No Romania Yes Russia No Ukraine Yes
Response rate. Aim: Objective response rate (XXX) Endpoint: Overall objective response rate as measured by RECIST 1.1 with modifications for progressive disease confirmation
Response rate. This metric is based on the percentage of positions broadcasted to the managed vendor, where the managed vendor has at least one submittal within the target time frame. 2.
Response rate. Measures the average time between a position broadcast and the vendor’s first submittal. This is compared to a target response.
Response rate. Of the 13 Principal Range States identified in the Action Plan five countries responded to the questionnaire (38%). Response received AEWA CP AEWA CP Ethiopia Yes Eritrea No Kazakhstan No India* CMS Russia No Iraq No Sudan Yes Oman No Turkey No Pakistan* CMS Saudi Arabia No Syria Yes Uzbekistan Yes *Outside of AEWA range, but are Contracting Parties to CMS
Response rate. We do not guarantee or represent a response rate for advertising mailed by us.
Response rate. The study had a sample size of 97 respondents from Safaricom limited and staff of Kenya Commercial Bank Group in the levels of Finance department, corporate strategy department, marketing department, legal and regulatory department and the risk management department. Out of 97 staff, 84 responses were obtained giving a response rate of 86.6%. The study did not achieve a 100% response rate as some of the questionnaires were half way filled by the respondents and hence could not be used in the study. However, according to Xxxxxxx (2004) any response of 50% and above is adequate for analysis thus 86.6% formed an acceptable basis for drawing conclusions.
