Results discussion Clause Samples

Results discussion summarizes all the processes for defining the probabilistic information associated with each basic node of the fault trees defined for assessing the impact on primary risk receptors (namely ground and ground-water) of interest in the real/virtual site for phase 1 of the project.
View Source
Results discussion. Even though lifeboat accident rates seem reduced today and less attention was paid compared to the previous years, it could still be dangerous and life-costing during drills and accident evacuation. So it is of importance to analyze lifeboat accidents to help improving lifeboat safety in an effective way. In this report, case analysis was presented in the beginning and scenarios were identified. This provides the basic explanations on why lifeboat accidents happened. This objective was discussed based on the corresponding accident reports. Based on this point of breakthrough, the causal factors were defined. The defined causal factors formed the foundation of the subsequent research. Following, influence diagrams were constructed. This gave a systemic understanding of the causal factors by classifying them in different levels. It can be seen that there is similarity between the influence diagrams and the human factors analysis and classification system. A coding structure is then proposed specially for the lifeboat accidents from the technical and operational aspects. This helped the construction of BBN in the next chapter. In this coding structure, accesses were also provided to help further quantitative analysis. No such coding work had been done and this work could be seen as the first one. BBNs were built in the next step based on the hybrid causal factor method. Based on the classification system in the previous chapter, technical failures were analyzed through fault trees and operational failures were analyzed through BBN. With the data limitation, it can be seen that plentiful assumptions were made to simplify and assist the quantitative analysis. Still, it provided the data required for calculating the probability of a certain failure. Previous studies had looked at accident causes and consequences without giving probability estimations as well as the consideration of interacting events. This could also be regarded as the first application of BBN on lifeboat accidents. However, this research did not manage to demonstrate the overall picture of causal factors’ probabilistic importance because of the time constraint and poor data size. Up to this step, it is able to build an analytical model for lifeboat accidents. After applying BBN on lifeboat accidents, an extra analysis of human and organizational factor was performed due to the reason that lifeboat operating heavily relies on people. It helps a systemic consideration of human and organizational ...
View Source
Results discussion. ‌ To test our adaptive strategy, we conducted two experiments for the low and high- speed resource dynamism. The low speed of resource change denotes that the GRA’s reservation amount of resource Gmax for task i can change at most on 5% of the corresponding client’s maximum amount of resource Rmax per round, while the high speed means the change up to 20%. Those quantitative choices aim to show two substantially distinctive cases, where the GRA’s reservation value changes on smaller or larger amounts per negotiation round respectively. We also evaluate our strategy for a number of other resource deviations in the following chapters. The minimum resource change denotes 0% and the uniform distribution is considered to generate these changes. The resource dynamism is modelled by the probability of tendency, i. e. the probability that the direction of the next resource change is the same as the direction of the previous one. In this way, the most tendentious resource dynamism is when this probability is equal to 1, i.
View Source
Results discussion. 3.4.1 Isotachophoresis in sub-micrometer channels
View Source

Related to Results discussion

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Financial Condition (a) The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2005 (including the notes thereto) (the “Pro Forma Balance Sheet”), copies of which have heretofore been furnished to each Lender, has been prepared giving effect (as if such events had occurred on such date) to (i) the Loans to be made on the Closing Date and the use of proceeds thereof, (ii) the issuance of the Senior Unsecured Notes and the use of proceeds thereof and (iii) the payment of fees and expenses in connection with the foregoing. The Pro Forma Balance Sheet has been prepared based on the best information available to the Borrower as of the date of delivery thereof, and presents fairly on a pro forma basis the estimated financial position of the Borrower and its consolidated Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2005, assuming that the events specified in the preceding sentence had actually occurred at such date. (b) The audited consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower as at December 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and of cash flows for the fiscal years ended on such dates (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”), reported on by and accompanied by an unqualified report from Deloitte & Touche LLP, present fairly the consolidated financial condition of the Borrower as at such date, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash flows for the respective fiscal years then ended. All such financial statements, including the related schedules and notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied consistently throughout the periods involved (except as approved by the aforementioned firm of accountants and disclosed therein). No Group Member has any material Guarantee Obligations, or any unusual forward or long-term commitments, including any interest rate or foreign currency swap or exchange transaction or other obligation in respect of derivatives, that are not reflected in the most recent financial statements referred to in this paragraph. During the period from December 31, 2005 to and including the date hereof there has been no Disposition by any Group Member of any material part of the business or property of the Group Members taken as a whole.

  • Results and Discussion All raw and processed results must be recorded neatly and clearly. Repeated values may be tabulated with clear headers. If there is more than one table, please give a clear and legible title to each one of them. Discussion section aims to analyze the results you obtain. This is done by describing them, explaining the results with respect to the theoretical expectation either by proving the theory or otherwise. When results are in agreement with the theory, (you may feel happy) the discussion may be written in support of the theory which may now be used to predict other possible conditions. However, if result differ from the expected, the discussion may be more interesting. Here is the case when the theory may be weak or wrong or the experimental result is wrong. Discussion may be centered in scrutiny of the theory and all its assumptions or on the other hand, on possible sources of errors in the experimental procedure.

  • Financial Statements; Material Adverse Change The consolidated balance sheet of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, as at December 31, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent public accountants, and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, as at June 30, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, for the six months then ended, copies of which have been furnished to each Lender and each Fronting Bank, in all cases as amended and restated to the date hereof, present fairly in all material respects the consolidated financial position of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries as at the indicated dates and the consolidated results of the operations of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the periods ended on the indicated dates, all in accordance with GAAP consistently applied (in the case of such statements that are unaudited, subject to year-end adjustments and the exclusion of detailed footnotes). Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents, there has been no change, event or occurrence since December 31, 2020 that has had a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.