Results of the questioner. The questioner was divided into three parts, each representing different aspect of our research. Part one looks into the preferences of the humanitarian organizations in respect to lead time, punctuality, flexibility, customized products, long-term contracts (LTA) and the extension of long-term agreements. The goal of this questioner is to find the preferences of the humanitarian organizations, and relate it to the theory. We wish to discover witch kind of relation they have to their suppliers, and what kind of attributes do they value from their suppliers. Do they value long-term relations, or only sourcing from the cheapest every time? Do they value punctuality and flexibility? If so this would be an indicator that a supplier placed with inventory closer to the beneficiaries would be a preferred supplier for a humanitarian catastrophe. Part two deals with ROFI Industirer As and their product spectrum, and from the different organizations point of view, how these products relate to the different kinds of natural disasters. These answers were inconclusive, and therefore scraped. Part three reveals the different organizations preferences regarding sourcing and pre- positioning, also in respect to ROFI Industrier AS and their product spectrum. Here we only found the answers form the question regarding sourcing conclusive and all other results where scraped. Anonymity 100 % 50 % 0 % yes no not relevant Percentage of respondents Before the respondents started on the questioner we gave them the opportunity to claim anonymity for the information they provided. 58% (7 out of 12) of the respondents choose this option. In respect of this, no organization are mentioned with name in relation to the questioner. Figure 10-1: Percentage of Participants wanting to be anonymous
