SDPL conceptual metamodel Sample Clauses

SDPL conceptual metamodel. The following definitions apply for the purposes of this law, and we have tried to capture them in Figure 1. – Personal data: any information concerning identified or identifiable natural persons. – File: any structured set of personal data, whatever the form or method of its creation, storage, and digital access. – Processing of data: operations and technical processes, which allow the col- lection, recording, storage, adaptation, modification, blocking and cancella- tion of data. Also, the assignments of data resulting from communications, consultations, interconnections, and transfers. – Data controller : natural or legal person, whether public or private, or ad- ministrative body which determines the purpose, content, and use of data processing. – Data subject : the natural person whom the personal data undergoing the processing refer to. – Dissociation procedure: any processing of personal data carried out in such a way that the information obtained cannot be associated with an identified or identifiable person. – Data processor : the natural or legal person, public authority, service or any other body which alone or jointly with others processes personal data on behalf of the controller. – Consent of the data subject : any free, unequivocal, specific, and informed indication of wishes by which the data subjects consent to the processing of personal data relating to them. – Communication of data: any disclosure of data to a person other than the data subject. – Sources accessible to the public: those files which can be consulted by anyone, which are not subject to restrictive legislation, or which are subject only to payment of a consultation fee. More concretely, the law considers public sources the publicity register, tele- phone directories, and the lists of persons belonging to professional associa- tions containing only data on the name, title, profession, activity, academic degree, address, and an indication of their membership to the association. Also, newspapers, official gazettes, and the media. Moreover, in Figure 2 we show how to extend the core conceptual metamodel to refine it with concepts that clearly affect the access to files, but are not present in the core definitions of the law, thus are not represented in Figure 1. For instance, the law does not apply to domestic files, classified files, and terrorism related files. Also, a file and a data controller are linked explicitly to a right, which may turn at run time into a permission to...