Soil Remediation and Post-Excavation Sampling Sample Clauses

Soil Remediation and Post-Excavation Sampling. The June 2008 soil sampling defined eight primary sub-slab locations with contamination above commercial-use SCOs and/or pigment staining, shown on Plate 3. These estimated excavation boundaries were determined based on the analytical results and the observations of pigment staining, as well as by the locations of building structural components and former operational activities. For example, the northern, southern and western boundaries of the impacted area in the Blue Wing (at borings SB-10 through SB-14A) were defined based on the absence of soil contamination and significant pigment staining at neighboring borings SB-7, SB-8, SB-9, SB-14 and SB-15. The eastern boundary of this remediation area was defined by the position of a retaining wall that forms the western side of the Grind & Mix Department, located one floor level below the Blue Wing (as noted above, the main building was constructed in several levels on a hill). The actual extent of IRM activities is provided on Plate 5. Post-excavation soil sampling was completed to document the effectiveness of the IRM in meeting the remedial goals. As proposed, this sampling was conducted in accordance with the post-excavation sampling frequencies specified in DER-10. DER-10 specifies those sampling frequencies based on the perimeter of an excavation. As all excavations at the Site were between 20 to 300 feet in perimeter, per DER-10, one post-excavation sidewall sample was obtained per 30 linear feet of sidewall and one basal sample was obtained per 900 square feet of excavation floor. These post-excavation sampling locations are shown on Figures 2 through 8 (to locate for specific excavation-area details, refer to the enlargement key provided on Plate 5). The sidewall samples for a given excavation were obtained from the interval(s) at which soil contamination requiring remediation was identified. For example, post-excavation sampling proximate to locations SB-16 and SB-17 was conducted at 0.5-1.0’, the only depth interval at which soil contamination was detected. Post-excavation sampling near locations SB-10 through SB-13, where soil contamination was detected at multiple depth intervals, targeted the uppermost and deepest intervals (i.e., 0.5-1.0’ and 4.0-4.5’) in which metals were detected above commercial-use SCOs. The actual post-excavation sampling depths for each IRM area are provided in the tables in Appendix B and in the databoxes included on the detail figures. As proposed, all post-excavation so...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Soil Remediation and Post-Excavation Sampling

  • Environmental Remediation Failure to remediate (or pursue the remediation process with due diligence and good faith) within the time period required by law or governmental order, (or within a reasonable time in light of the nature of the problem if no specific time period is so established), environmental problems in violation of Applicable Law related to Properties of the Borrower and/or its Subsidiaries where the estimated cost of remediation is in the aggregate in excess of Seventy-Five Million Dollars ($75,000,000), in each case after all administrative hearings and appeals have been concluded.

  • Remediation The Charter School shall provide remediation in required cases pursuant to State Board of Education Rule 160-4-5-.01 and No Child Left Behind, subject to any amendment, waiver or reauthorization thereof

  • First sampling In the first sampling four lamps are selected at random. The first sample of two is marked A, the second sample of two is marked B.

  • Responsibility for Environmental Contamination 5.20.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other for any costs whatsoever resulting from the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard that either Party did not introduce to the affected Work Location. Both Parties shall defend and hold harmless the other, its officers, directors and employees from and against any losses, damages, claims, demands, suits, liabilities, fines, penalties and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) that arise out of or result from (i) any Environmental Hazard that the Indemnifying Party, its contractors or agents introduce to the Work Locations or (ii) the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard for which the Indemnifying Party is responsible under Applicable Law.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Sampling The Licensee agrees that the Composition is purchased as a “Work Made for Hire” whereby the clearing of any sampled materials is the responsibility of Licensee.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

  • INSPECTION AND REJECTION 8.1 Purchaser shall have the right to inspect and test Products at any time prior to shipment, and within a reasonable time after delivery to the Purchaser’s Destination. Products not inspected within a reasonable time after delivery shall be deemed accepted by Purchaser. The payment for Products shall in no way impair the right of Purchaser to reject nonconforming Products, or to avail itself of any other remedies to which it may be entitled.

  • Remediation Plan If deficiencies or weaknesses are cited on the evaluation form, the evaluator, working with the evaluatee, shall develop a written remediation plan for the purpose of assisting the evaluatee to improve. The remedial action plan shall be attached to the evaluation document and shall contain:

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.