Some SINR Results Sample Clauses

Some SINR Results. Combining the proposed pieces of the puzzle - i.e. enlarged cooperation areas, partial CoMP in combination with cover shifts and the Tortoise concept for interference floor shaping- significant SINR gains were achieved as can be concluded from an exemplary simulation in Figure 5.6. The figure contains the SINR cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of different CoMP schemes, using the simulation parameters of Table 5.1. The reference case is the Geometry factor as defined in [3GPPTR2]. The label ‘Network centric cooperation’ refers to the case of cooperation over 3 cells of a site, i.e. intra-site cooperation. The blue line is for ‘full cooperation’ over 9 cells and includes the cover shift concept together with full reporting of all channel components. For ‘partial CoMP’ the reporting of CCs has been limited to the ones being above a power threshold THCC. The thin lines represent results in the absence of additional interference floor shaping. An artificial ideal CDF has been added for comparison as a broad vertical pink-red line. It represents an SINR of about 20dB for all UEs of the network. This would lead to the maximum spectral efficiency in an LTE downlink together with best possible user fairness, i.e. all UEs are served by using the maximum possible modulation and coding scheme. The thick magenta curve in Figure 5.6 is the best so far achieved result for the overall interference mitigation framework, including interference floor shaping by varying antenna downtilt and transmit power control. It demonstrates the large gains due to interference floor shaping, especially important for cell edge users. For the overall concept, about 70% of the users achieve an excellent SINR of at least 20dB, thereby verifying the potential of the interference control part of the overall JT-CoMP framework. While promising these results are only an intermediate step as each cell here serves just one single UE with a single data stream. A specific CoMP scheduler designed to maximize the number of UEs per cell and per CA without sacrificing the SINR will be introduced in the next Subsection. Table 5.1: Main simulation parameters Number of cells 57 Number of sites 19 Cells (Sectors) per site 3 Sector width 120 deg Number of PRB/subframe 32 Bandwidth per PRB 180 kHz Transmit antennas per cell 4 Receive antennas per UE 1 / 2 Joint precoding Zero forcing Channel modell SCME Inter-site distance 500 m Antenna tilting XXX/ XXX 00 / 00 xxx Xxxxxx penetration loss No CSI Ideal (...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Some SINR Results

  • How Do I Get More Information? For more information, including the full Notice, Claim Forms and Settlement Agreement go to xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, contact the settlement administrator at 0-000-000-0000, or call Class Counsel at 1-866-354-3015. Exhibit E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Xxxxx v. AvMed, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-24513 If You Paid for or Received Insurance from AvMed, Inc. at Any Time Through December of 2009, You May Be Part of a Class Action Settlement. IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO THE PENDENCY OF A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND, IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASSES, CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS TO MAKE A CLAIM UNDER THE SETTLEMENT OR TO OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT (A federal court authorized this notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer.) Your legal rights are affected whether or not you act. Please read this notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM This is the only way to receive a payment. EXCLUDE YOURSELF You will receive no benefits, but you will retain any rights you currently have to xxx the Defendant about the claims in this case. OBJECT Write to the Court explaining why you don’t like the Settlement. GO TO THE HEARING Ask to speak in Court about your opinion of the Settlement. DO NOTHING You won’t get a share of the Settlement benefits and will give up your rights to xxx the Defendant about the claims in this case. These rights and options – and the deadlines to exercise them – are explained in this Notice. QUESTIONS? CALL 0-000-000-0000 TOLL FREE, OR VISIT XXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX PARA UNA NOTIFICACIÓN EN ESPAÑOL, LLAMAR O VISITAR NUESTRO WEBSITE BASIC INFORMATION

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Dissemination of own Results 8.3.1.1 During the Project and for a period of 1 year after the end of the Project, the dissemination of own Results by one or several Parties including but not restricted to publications and presentations, shall be governed by the procedure of Article 29.1 of the Grant Agreement subject to the following provisions. Prior notice of any planned publication shall be given to the other Parties at least 45 calendar days before the publication. Any objection to the planned publication shall be made in accordance with the Grant Agreement in writing to the Coordinator and to the Party or Parties proposing the dissemination within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice. If no objection is made within the time limit stated above, the publication is permitted.

  • Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • 311 Plan of Operations For timber sales with 2 or more years between award date and Termina- tion Date, within 60 days of final award of contract, Pur- chaser shall furnish Forest Service a written general Plan of Operations that shall be in addition to the annual Oper- ating Schedule required under B6.31. The Plan of Opera- tions shall set forth planned periods for and methods of road construction, timber harvesting, and completion of slash disposal, erosion control measures, and other contractual requirements. Forest Service written approval of the Plan of Operations is prerequisite to commence- ment of Purchaser’s Operations. Purchaser may revise this Plan of Operations when necessitated by weather, markets, or other unpredictable circumstances, subject to approval of Contracting Officer. In the event of delays be- yond the control of Purchaser that qualify for Contract Term Adjustment, the Plan of Operations shall be ad- justed by mutual agreement to accommodate the ad- justed contract period. B6.312 Plan of Operations for Road Con- struction. Annually, prior to start of construction, Pur- chaser shall submit a supplement to the Plan of Opera- tions that shall include a schedule of proposed progress and a description of planned measures to be taken to provide erosion control for work in progress, including special measures to be taken on any segments of con- struction not Substantially Completed prior to periods of seasonal precipitation or runoff. Purchaser shall submit a revised schedule when Purchaser proposes a significant deviation from the progress schedule. Prior to beginning construction on any portion of Specified Roads identified as sensitive on Plans, Pur- chaser and Forest Service shall agree on proposed method of construction.

  • INFORMATION ON THE GROUP The core business of the Group is property development and investment in Western China and treasury investment.

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.