Target Unit Results Sample Clauses

Target Unit Results. TU Identifier Operator name CCA emissions tCO2e Target passed? Buy-out purchased? DATC/T00025 Ark Data Centres Limited 1,087.45 N Y DATC/T00028 Ark Data Centres Limited 692.83 Y N DATC/T00004 CenturyLink Technology UK Limited 7,018.60 Y N DATC/T00027 Colt Data Centre Services UK Ltd 7,550.96 Y N DATC/T00032 CSC Computer Sciences Ltd 6,103.13 Y N DATC/T00017 DataBanx Limited 155.26 Y N DATC/T00018 DataBanx Limited 1,009.38 Y N DATC/T00019 DataBanx Limited 105.00 Y N DATC/T00003 Digital Realty (UK) Limited 31,843.87 Y N DATC/T00010 Enfield DC Service Company Ltd 2,121.75 Y N DATC/T00011 Equinix (UK) Ltd 27,749.02 Y N DATC/T00030 Fujitsu Services Limited 5,604.65 Y N DATC/T00005 Global Switch Ltd 46,321.77 Y N DATC/T00015 Gyron Internet Ltd 3,876.10 Y N DATC/T00024 IBM United Kingdom Limited 1,202.68 Y N DATC/T00026 IBM United Kingdom Limited 3,424.49 N Y DATC/T00022 IBM United Kingdom Limited 3,872.70 N Y DATC/T00023 IBM United Kingdom Limited 4,330.80 Y N DATC/T00014 Iomart Hostings Ltd 4,425.21 Y N DATC/T00020 Level 3 Communications Ltd 7,740.77 N Y DATC/T00021 Level 3 Communications Ltd 1,315.22 N Y DATC/T00001 NEXT GENERATION DATA LIMITED 3,185.23 Y N DATC/T00012 Pulsant Limited 5,854.66 Y N DATC/T00002 Six Degrees Technology Group Ltd 2,261.97 Y N DATC/T00006 Sungard Availability Services (UK) Ltd 14,580.06 Y N DATC/T00034 Talk Talk Group 776.44 Y N DATC/T00035 Talk Talk Group 521.87 Y N DATC/T00036 Talk Talk Group 465.35 N Y DATC/T00037 Talk Talk Group 67.20 Y N DATC/T00038 Talk Talk Group 256.11 N Y DATC/T00007 TATA Communications (UK) Ltd 2,759.37 Y N DATC/T00013 TelecityGroup UK Ltd 19,886.79 Y N DATC/T00031 Telehouse International Ltd 13,754.85 N Y DATC/T00029 Telstra Limited 2,634.91 Y N DATC/T00008 Unisys Limited 2,007.47 Y N DATC/T00009 Vodafone Ltd 14,884.37 N Y Extract from Environment Agency Report released 29 October 2015
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Target Unit Results

  • Positive Test Results In the event an employee tests positive for drug use, the employee will be provided, in writing, notice of their right to explain the test results. The employee may indicate any relevant circumstance, including over the counter or prescription medication taken within the last thirty (30) days, or any other information relevant to the reliability of, or explanation for, a positive test result.

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Positive Test Result Where there has been a positive test result in a confirmatory test and in any confirmatory retest (if the employee requested one), the Employer will do the following unless the employee has furnished a legitimate medical reason for the positive test result:

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Target Population The Grantee shall ensure that diversion programs and services provided under this grant are designed to serve juvenile offenders who are at risk of commitment to Department.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.