Threatened Litigation. As disclosed on Schedule 5.25 of the Disclosure Schedules the Members and either or both of the Companies have been threatened with litigation by Signia Solutions, Inc. and/or Mxxxxx X. Xxxxx (the “Signia Threatened Litigation”). The Members shall jointly and severally indemnify FAAC for any and all liability, of any kind or nature related to the Signia Threatened Litigation (the forgoing indemnification to be deemed to be and treated as an Uncapped and Non-Threshold Indemnification for purposes of Section 9.2(f).
Threatened Litigation. The following customer(s) have submitted a written complaint which the Company has reason to believe may result in litigation, but no action has been taken by the customer as of the date of this agreement: Carol Jones. Purchaser acknowledges that the Company has xxxxxxxxx xo Purchaser, and Purchaser has reviewed, summaries and actual documents relating to these complaint(s).
Threatened Litigation. To the best of Seller's knowledge, there are no threatened claims, actions, investigations or legal or administrative proceedings regarding the Assets or Seller's ability to transfer the Assets, nor does Seller know of any basis for any such claim, action or proceeding.
Threatened Litigation. To Seller's Knowledge, there is no pending or threatened litigation or claims, including without limitation condemnation claims, pertaining to the Property or the Seller.
Threatened Litigation. In June 1999, the Corporation received a letter from counsel for Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx threatening litigation based on wrongful termination and breach of contract theories. Since that time, there have been no further threats of litigation nor other communications from counsel to Xx. Xxxxxxx.
Threatened Litigation. Letter dated June 3, 2010 from Felt, Monson, & Culichia, LLC representing Russel and Evelyn Hudler (xxx "Hudlexx") xxxxxxxng claims against Parent as the majority interest holder of Huerfano Cucharas Irrigation Company arising from the Hudlers' 4% ownership thereof and special assessments related thereto. Parent intends to vigorously defend these claims. SCHEDULE 7.2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 14, 2010 by and among Two Rivers Water Company, TRWC and Two Rivers Basin, LLC None. EXHIBIT A Ballou Loreen Cawlfield Wixxxxx Cxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X & X Xxxxxxxxx Xoxxxxxxx and Gexxxx Xxxxjxx Xxxxxx Greaxxxxxx Xxxxxxxoxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx Hxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Pxxx Xoxxxx XXX Xxxxxex Xoxxxx Xxxxxxia Hoxxxx-XxXxxxxx Jxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx XXXX Xxxxx xxx Xxxh Xxxxxy Kevix, Xxah anx Xxxxxx Xxcxxx Xaex Xxrtin (000 xxxxxx) Nxxxxx XxxxxernColorado Laxx Xx. Charles Storm Vendetti Funx Xxxxxxxx Xxmxxxxxxxx XXX Hxxxxxxx, XXX Xxxxxxx Sagstetter Exhibit 1.1 Document processing fee If document is filed on paper $150.00 If document is filed electronically Currently Not Available Fees & forms/cover sheets are subject to change. To file electronically, access instructions for this form/cover sheet and other information or print copies of filed documents, visit www.sos.state.co.us and xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxter. Paper documents must be typewritten or machine printed. Statement of Merger (Surviving Entity is a Domestic Entity) filed pursuant to Section 7-0--203.7 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.)
1. For each merging entity, its ID number (if applicable), entity name or true name, form of entity, jurisdiction under the law of which it is formed, and principal address are ID Number 20081507400 --------------------- (Colorado Secretary of State ID number) Entity name or true name Two Rivers Basic LLC Form of entity Limited Liability Company Jurisdiction Colorado Street address 13 Pedregal Pueblo, CO 81005 Xxxxxxx xxxxxxx (leave blank if same as street address) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ID Number ----------------------- (Colorado Secretary of State ID number) Entity name or true name Form of entity Jurisdiction Street address -------------------------------- Mailing address -------------------------------- (leave blank if same as street address) (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by marking the box and include any attachment.) [_] There are more than three merging entitie...
Threatened Litigation. 1. Stalik v 3M v Kodak Indemnification demanded by Imation to recover $105K paid in settling an asbestos claim.
2. Frxxxxx x Kodak Property damage claim by dentist for $56K, alleging that Kodak chemistry discolored his office.
Threatened Litigation. To the Knowledge of NJPV and the Guarantors, no Litigation is threatened or expected by or against any Group Member or any Guarantor in any respect that can reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
Threatened Litigation. To the Seller’s Knowledge and except as disclosed in Exhibit 11.17.2 no event has occurred or circumstance exists that could reasonably be expected to give rise to or serve as a basis for the commencement of any litigation or arbitration proceeding against the Acquired Company or its Subsidiaries.
Threatened Litigation. To the Holder’s knowledge, no Person, other than the Holder in respect of the Secured Indebtedness, Stroock, Stroock & Xxxxx LLP, in respect of the Stroock Claim and the Internal Revenue Service in respect of the Tax Damages has given a written notice of default to the Company, the Company’s Subsidiaries, the Holder or the Holder’s Affiliates with respect to any Indebtedness or written notice of breach by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of their contractual obligations to such Person. The Holder has furnished to Parent a list, which to the Holder’s Knowledge, is complete and correct, of the holders of the Company’s unsecured notes.
