Common use of Voip PSTN Traffic Clause in Contracts

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., the actual geographic end points of the call) since the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., i.e. the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffiic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. 59.13. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Traffic - CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local such by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably reasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. 56.5.1 Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Traffic CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local such by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., i.e. the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. 52.7.1 Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Traffic CLEC and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local such by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., i.e. the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffic.

Voip PSTN Traffic. a. Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic. CLEC CenturyLink Communications LLC,and CenturyLink will exchange Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic on the same basis and at the same rates as Local Traffic which is not VoIP-VoIP- PSTN Traffic. VoIP-PSTN Traffic will be identified as either Local or non-Local by using the originating and terminating call detail information of each call unless the Parties specifically agree otherwise. This call jurisdiction method described herein is intended by the Parties as a proxy to determine the jurisdiction of a call (i.e., i.e. the actual geographic end points of the call) since and the Parties acknowledge that there may be some circumstances where the actual geographic end points of a particular VoIP-PSTN Traffic call may be difficult or impossible to determine. At any time during the term of this Agreement, CLEC CenturyLink Communications LLC,and CenturyLink may agree on alternate methods to establish call jurisdiction for Local VoIP-PSTN Traffic based on regulatory or technological evolution. The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of both Parties to work together in an effort to continue to improve the accuracy of jurisdictional data and such efforts shall not be unreasonably withheld by either Party. This paragraph shall not be controlling with respect to VNXX Traffic which otherwise constitutes VoIP-PSTN Traffic, nor shall this paragraph affect the determination of the proper jurisdiction or the geographic end points of any traffic which is not VoIP-PSTN Traffic, including without limitation, any VNXX Traffiic.