Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx Sample Clauses

Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. RFP No. 19-
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. RFP No. 19-80111502-A Cover Letter Page 3 We look forward to working with Department on this important initiative. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 000.000.0000 or xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx. Sincerely, Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, CPA, CFE Member TABLE OF CONTENTS RFP No. 19-80111502-A September 10, 2019 Table of Contents  Table of Contents iv  About Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx 5  Experience 6 • Claims Auditing Experience 8 • Knowledge of Government and Florida Business Practices 11 • Peer Review 12 • Continuing Professional Education 12  Proposed Solution 13 • Staff 13 • Audit Process 16 • Sample Sizes 19 • Summary 19 PROPOSAL RESPONSE RFP No. 19-80111502-A September 10, 2019 About Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx is a national certified public accounting (CPA) firm organized in the state of Kansas. We specialize in providing auditing, analysis, consulting, data management, accounting, and other operational support services to local, state, and federal government health care agencies. Through these opportunities, we have prevented unnecessary program expenditures; identified hundreds of millions of dollars of inappropriate payments and recoveries; assisted in the development of reimbursement systems; performed eligibility audits and analysis; defended audit findings from providers’ administrative and judicial challenges; and performed data management and analysis services to assist our clients in better managing their programs. We were founded, and continue to operate, on the principles of extraordinary client service and an unwavering commitment to quality. Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx is highly regarded nationwide for our professional objectivity, innovation, quality people, and unparalleled service. Our success has been achieved by providing our clients with excellent service on a timely basis, including those times when clients have made urgent requests with minimal turnaround time. Our unparalleled service requires commitment and an understanding of the client’s goals and objectives, as well as specialized industry knowledge to help our clients achieve success. Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx does not contract with health plans, managed care organizations (MCOs), or third- party administrators (TPAs), thereby avoiding perceived and real conflicts of interest. The Department can have complete confidence in our findings. Utilizing Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx to perform claims auditing services will afford the Department an additional level of quality and performance, since CPA ...
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. Capacity: Corporation Address: 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 000, Xxxxxx Xxxxx 00000
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. Quantity is a part of the description and is essential to the contract. A seller cannot supply goods that correspond with the contract description, quantity aside, and then say that this quantity is fit for the purpose.
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. MRI Manufacturers Forge New Opportunities With Open Systems and Short Bore Magnets; 1998
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx acknowledge and agree that pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement Agent issued an irrevocable standby letter of credit for the account of Borrower on October 28, 1996 in the principal amount of $613,275.00 for the benefit of Aquamaster-Rauma Ltd. with an expiry date of April 15, 1997. Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx further acknowledge and agree that such letter of credit together with any other letters of credit issued pursuant to the Original Credit Agreement shall be deemed outstanding Letters of Credit under this Agreement and shall be governed by the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. Blue Earth is currently a party to an AAA proceeding commenced by D. Xxxxx Xxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, two consultants that have alleged that Blue Earth violated the “no disparagement” clause of their Consulting Agreement dated February 17, 2014 with Blue Earth. They alleged that Blue Earth interfered with the ability of the Consultants to perform their consulting duties. Blue Earth alleges that the Consultants failed to perform consulting work as required and never intended to perform under the Consulting Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. Xxxxx shall defend, indemnify and --------------- hold Consultant harmless from and against all damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) as a result of claims made by third parties arising out of Consultant's performance of services under this agreement; provided, -------- however, that Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx shall not indemnify and hold Consultant ------- harmless for Consultant's own gross negligence or willful misconduct.
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. Xxxxxx X. Gold Oldman, Cooley, Sallus, Birnberg, Xxxxxxx & Gold, LLP 00000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx. XX Xxxxxx, XX 00000 xxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000 Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx & Xxxxxxxxx, LLP 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000 If to Xxxx: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, LLP 0000 Xxxxxx xx xxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Xxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000 If to GAL: Xxxxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxx & Benz, LLP 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000 If to Xxxxxxx Packing Corporation: Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Packing Corporation 00000 Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx (000) 000-0000
Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. The original agreement was varied once by giving a week's time to confirm the sale and again by pushing up the purchase price to Rs. 87,500/- (sometimes quoted as Rs. 87,000/- —see paragraph 4(c)(i) of the answer). That there was a promise to repay the advance if the sale failed is evidenced by the writing P3 of 31.1.19^0 and telegram P2 of 29.1.1970 (wrongly dated in the issue No. 1(b) as 7.2.1970). This promise was repeated in the presence of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx xx Xxxxx by the defendant in early February. Xxxxxxx xx Xxxxx states the plaintiff was reluctantly prepared to accept the repayment of Rs. 5,250/- and the plaintiff too agrees that this was so. It is argued on behalf o f the defendant that the promise contained in P2 and P3 is a new promise which plaintiff refused to accept and therefore created no contract. But the fact is that later when plaintiff's Xxxxxxx inter- wpnpri th e n t a in t i f f tn r«rp!i/n xxxx- thp mrtnm/ »«ith an a ririitin n a l
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!