Common use of Xxxxxxx Review Clause in Contracts

Xxxxxxx Review. a. The Chancellor shall initiate a review of the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor (hereinafter referred to as Xxxxxxx) after five (5) years in that position and once every five (5) years thereafter, by which the faculty, in conjunction with other University groups, submits a written review of the Xxxxxxx. b. If the Xxxxxxx is going to be so reviewed in a given academic year, he/she shall be so advised in writing by the Chancellor. c. The review shall be conducted by a review committee consisting of one representative each of the following groups selected by those groups (Faculty Association, Faculty Senate, Graduate Council, AP Council, Civil Service Employees Council, Graduate and Professional Student Council and Undergraduate Student Government), as well as a representative of the Deans chosen by the Deans and a representative of department chairs selected by the Chancellor. A majority of the review committee will be persons holding faculty rank. d. The review committee, in consultation with the Chancellor, shall specify the criteria and procedures used by the review committee. e. The Xxxxxxx shall be given an opportunity to meet with the review committee prior to the preparation of the written review. f. The review committee shall prepare a confidential report that will include its supporting documentation, as well as the results of any vote taken on whether the Xxxxxxx should continue to serve as Xxxxxxx. g. Both the review committee’s confidential report, and the Xxxxxxx’x response, if any, shall be submitted to the Chancellor. h. The Chancellor and the review committee shall prepare a public summary of the review, which summary may also include the Chancellor’s own review. i. If there is a dispute over the contents of the public summary between the Chancellor and a majority of the review committee, the following dispute resolution mechanism will be implemented: A three member committee will be established consisting of one SIUC employee holding faculty rank appointed by a majority of the review committee, one SIUC academic administrator appointed by the Chancellor, and one SIUC employee holding faculty rank selected by the other two committee members. If the other two committee members cannot agree on the third member, that member shall be the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute or an SIUC employee holding faculty rank designated by the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute. The committee will render a final and binding decision on the contents of the summary within thirty (30) days after the third member is selected. j. If requested by a majority of the review committee, the Chancellor shall meet with the review committee and the heads of the groups represented on the review committee to discuss what actions, if any, might be considered/taken as a result of the review. k. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent the Chancellor from evaluating or assessing the performance of the Xxxxxxx at any time. l. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent a majority of the faculty from requesting that the Chancellor initiate a review of Xxxxxxx at any time, with the understanding that it would be up to the Chancellor to decide whether or not to initiate such a review. m. Any such written evaluation submitted to the Chancellor shall be advisory only. Nothing herein shall interfere with or alter the right of the Board of Trustees, President or Chancellor to select, evaluate, and determine the employment status of the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor, provided that the Chancellor will review the most recent written evaluations, if any, submitted as provided above in connection with the evaluation and/or the making of recommendations or determinations concerning the employment status of the Xxxxxxx. n. If the Association files a grievance alleging that the University has violated the terms of this Section, the issue to be submitted to arbitration, if the grievance is not settled prior to arbitration, shall be limited to whether the University violated the Faculty Association’s rights under the terms of this Section (not the alleged rights of another group such as the Faculty Senate) and, if so, the appropriate remedy. No individual or group other than the Association shall have the right to use the grievance and arbitration procedure to allege that the University has violated the terms of this Section.

Xxxxxxx Review. ‌ a. The Chancellor shall initiate a review of the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor (hereinafter referred to as Xxxxxxx) after five (5) years in that position and once every five (5) years thereafter, by which the faculty, in conjunction with other University groups, submits a written review of the Xxxxxxx. b. If the Xxxxxxx is going to be so reviewed in a given academic year, he/she shall be so advised in writing by the Chancellor. c. The review shall be conducted by a review committee consisting of one representative each of the following groups selected by those groups (Faculty Association, Faculty Senate, Graduate Council, AP Council, Civil Service Employees Council, Graduate and Professional Student Council and Undergraduate Student Government), as well as a representative of the Deans chosen by the Deans and a representative of department chairs selected by the Chancellor. A majority of the review committee will be persons holding faculty rank. d. The review committee, in consultation with the Chancellor, shall specify the criteria and procedures used by the review committee. e. The Xxxxxxx shall be given an opportunity to meet with the review committee prior to the preparation of the written review. f. The review committee shall prepare a confidential report that will include its supporting documentation, as well as the results of any vote taken on whether the Xxxxxxx should continue to serve as Xxxxxxx. g. Both the review committee’s confidential report, and the Xxxxxxx’x response, if any, shall be submitted to the Chancellor. h. The Chancellor and the review committee shall prepare a public summary of the review, which summary may also include the Chancellor’s own review. i. If there is a dispute over the contents of the public summary between the Chancellor and a majority of the review committee, the following dispute resolution mechanism will be implemented: A three member committee will be established consisting of one SIUC employee holding faculty rank appointed by a majority of the review committee, one SIUC academic administrator appointed by the Chancellor, and one SIUC employee holding faculty rank selected by the other two committee members. If the other two committee members cannot agree on the third member, that member shall be the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute or an SIUC employee holding faculty rank designated by the Director of the SIUC Public Policy Institute. The committee will render a final and binding decision on the contents of the summary within thirty (30) days after the third member is selected. j. If requested by a majority of the review committee, the Chancellor shall meet with the review committee and the heads of the groups represented on the review committee to discuss what actions, if any, might be considered/taken as a result of the review. k. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent the Chancellor from evaluating or assessing the performance of the Xxxxxxx at any time. l. Nothing herein is intended to preclude or prevent a majority of the faculty from requesting that the Chancellor initiate a review of Xxxxxxx at any time, with the understanding that it would be up to the Chancellor to decide whether or not to initiate such a review. m. Any such written evaluation submitted to the Chancellor shall be advisory only. Nothing herein shall interfere with or alter the right of the Board of Trustees, President or Chancellor to select, evaluate, and determine the employment status of the Xxxxxxx and Vice Chancellor, provided that the Chancellor will review the most recent written evaluations, if any, submitted as provided above in connection with the evaluation and/or the making of recommendations or determinations concerning the employment status of the Xxxxxxx. n. If the Association files a grievance alleging that the University has violated the terms of this Section, the issue to be submitted to arbitration, if the grievance is not settled prior to arbitration, shall be limited to whether the University violated the Faculty Association’s rights under the terms of this Section (not the alleged rights of another group such as the Faculty Senate) and, if so, the appropriate remedy. No individual or group other than the Association shall have the right to use the grievance and arbitration procedure to allege that the University has violated the terms of this Section.