We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Abnormal definition

Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and components of the home.
Abnormal means a result of an analysis performed as part of a newborn screening test that deviates from the range of values established by the Department.
Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and

Examples of Abnormal in a sentence

  • Any condition or situation that results from lack of sufficient generating capacity to meet load requirements or that results solely from economic conditions shall not, standing alone, constitute an Abnormal Condition.

  • Abnormal conditions involving compliance with the foregoing provision will be cleared with the utility and permission granted by the utility prior to locating the customer connection.

  • In the event of Abnormal Weather Conditions or force majeure, the Contractor shall be compensated for re-installation of BMPs at established Unit Prices.

  • Abnormal weather and/or other unforeseen events may cause greater or lesser curtailment of service than expected.

  • No claim for financial or any other adjustments to VALUE OF CONTRACT, on lack of clarity of such factors shall be entertained.20 Abnormal Rates:20.1The tenderer is expected to quote rate for each item after careful analysis of cost involved for the performance of the completed item considering all specifications and Conditions of Contract.


More Definitions of Abnormal

Abnormal means the anticipated release of flammable gas, vapor, or vapor liquid within the enclosure when the system that supplies the flammable gas, vapor or vapor liquid is either leaking or is otherwise operating abnormally. The magnitude of this anticipated release is one of the following:
Abnormal means something unusual, rarely happening: if something is rare enough, it is not typical (“abnormal”). Let us describe what, e.g., an abnormal height may mean. If a person’s height is 6 ft, it is still normal (although it may be considered abnormal in some parts of the world). Now, if instead of 6 pt, we consider 6 ft 1 in, 6 ft 2 in, etc, then sooner or later we will end up with a height h such that everyone who is higher than h will be definitely called a person of abnormal height. We may not be sure what exactly value h experts will call “abnormal”, but we are sure that such a value exists.
Abnormal means that the lab results are outside the reference range
Abnormal means something unusual, rarely happening: if something is rare enough, it is not typical (“abnormal”). Let us describe what, e.g., an abnormal height may mean. If a person’s height is ≥ 6 ft, it is still normal (although it
Abnormal means ‘statistically abnormal’]. Once we make this interpretative move, the rest of the paper follows” (Hieronymi, 2020, p. 18, n. 11). According to Hieronymi, the claim’s being baffling may be the reason why “this interpretation of Strawson has not been previously considered” (Hieronymi, 2020, p. 23). If this means that it has not been seriously considered, that might be right. But it has been to some extent considered. Russell, making the critical point that “it is not abnormality, as such, that excuses but, rather, incapacity” (2017d, p. 42) may be understood as cutting against precisely something like the statistical interpretation of the premise. Also, McKenna and Pereboom explicitly consider that interpretation, “On its face, it appears that [Strawson] is making the point that abnormality is statistically at odds with applying to all cases”, but they conclude that “Strawson should not be read in this way” even if they “grant that the text invites this reading” (McKenna & Pereboom, 2016, p. 145, n. 10).
Abnormal identity as a means to positively impact the legal discourse and receive her desired outcome. She was „expected to play the deviant role‟ (Barnes et al., 1999:23) which required her stigmatised attribute be openly discussed in court. Performing this identity contributes to people‟s fear of the uncertain consequences of „knowing that in their hearts the others may be defining him in terms of his stigma‟ (Goffman, 2006:136). Thus the interview participants (2011) were uncertain how their deviant category would be used in judicial discourses.
Abnormal is defined as substantially out of line with the normal ratio of profit to turnover. For example, if a 40 per cent. profit is earned by the group in relation to turnover in one continent, compared with 10 per cent. on turnover elsewhere, this fact should be made apparent.