Abnormal definition
Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and components of the home.
Abnormal means a result of an analysis performed as part of a newborn screening test that deviates from the range of values established by the Department.
Abnormal means nontypical or unusual conditions that could cause damage to systems and
Examples of Abnormal in a sentence
In the event of Abnormal Weather Conditions or force majeure, the Contractor shall be compensated for re-installation of BMPs at established Unit Prices.
Any condition or situation that results from lack of sufficient generating capacity to meet load requirements or that results solely from economic conditions shall not, standing alone, constitute an Abnormal Condition.
The Company further reserves the right to suspend, delay and/or amend the provision of any Services in the event of Abnormal Market Conditions.
In the event Abnormal Weather Conditions or force majeure damage the BMPs, the Contractor shall be compensated for repair or re-installation of BMPs at established Unit Prices, where such repair or reinstallation is not covered by insurance supplied by the Contractor.
Abnormal intensity of a natural agent not resulting from human intervention.
More Definitions of Abnormal
Abnormal means something unusual, rarely happening: if something is rare enough, it is not typical (“abnormal”). Let us describe what, e.g., an abnormal height may mean. If a person’s height is 6 ft, it is still normal (although it may be considered abnormal in some parts of the world). Now, if instead of 6 pt, we consider 6 ft 1 in, 6 ft 2 in, etc, then sooner or later we will end up with a height h such that everyone who is higher than h will be definitely called a person of abnormal height. We may not be sure what exactly value h experts will call “abnormal”, but we are sure that such a value exists.
Abnormal means the anticipated release of flammable gas, vapor, or vapor liquid within the enclosure when the system that supplies the flammable gas, vapor or vapor liquid is either leaking or is otherwise operating abnormally. The magnitude of this anticipated release is one of the following:
Abnormal is defined as substantially out of line with the normal ratio of profit to turnover. For example, if a 40 per cent. profit is earned by the group in relation to turnover in one continent, compared with 10 per cent. on turnover elsewhere, this fact should be made apparent.
Abnormal means that the lab results are outside the reference range
Abnormal based on the kappa coefficients. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [5] reported com- parable results. Since the kappa coefficient de- pends on the true prevalence, studies can only be correctly compared if there is agreement of the group divisions [22]. For this reason, we selected group divisions in agreement with those of Roovers et al. [5]. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [15], ▇▇▇▇▇ et al. and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. [13, 14] described better results for the kappa values but because the divi- sion of groups is not in agreement with ours, no direct comparison can be made. This fact has not always been adequately taken into account in other studies [5]. A poor agreement is clear in the study by Disat et al. [25]. The computation of the hier- archical ANOVA, the intra-class correlation coef- ficient (ICC), the application of the method by ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ to obtain the estimates of bias and the limits of agreement together with the estima- tion of the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) by ▇▇▇ seem to be appropriate statistical tools to study the agreement between observer groups. Moreover, the inter-observer agreement found in our study is comparable with the results of other studies [5, 13–15].
Abnormal means ‘statistically abnormal’]. Once we make this interpretative move, the rest of the paper follows” (Hieronymi, 2020, p. 18, n. 11). According to Hieronymi, the claim’s being baffling may be the reason why “this interpretation of Strawson has not been previously considered” (Hieronymi, 2020, p. 23). If this means that it has not been seriously considered, that might be right. But it has been to some extent considered. Russell, making the critical point that “it is not abnormality, as such, that excuses but, rather, incapacity” (2017d, p. 42) may be understood as cutting against precisely something like the statistical interpretation of the premise. Also, McKenna and Pereboom explicitly consider that interpretation, “On its face, it appears that [Strawson] is making the point that abnormality is statistically at odds with applying to all cases”, but they conclude that “Strawson should not be read in this way” even if they “grant that the text invites this reading” (McKenna & Pereboom, 2016, p. 145, n. 10).
Abnormal identity as a means to positively impact the legal discourse and receive her desired outcome. She was „expected to play the deviant role‟ (Barnes et al., 1999:23) which required her stigmatised attribute be openly discussed in court. Performing this identity contributes to people‟s fear of the uncertain consequences of „knowing that in their hearts the others may be defining him in terms of his stigma‟ (Goffman, 2006:136). Thus the interview participants (2011) were uncertain how their deviant category would be used in judicial discourses.