Examples of Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage in a sentence
If DBCT Management having completed a FEL 1 Feasibility Study and FEL 2 Feasibility Study, acting reasonably and consistently with prudent business practice concludes that Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage applied for in one or more Access Applications lodged with it, together with all other relevant circumstances, justify it undertaking a FEL 3 Feasibility Study, DBCT Management may, at its own cost, undertake a FEL 3 Feasibility Study.
DBCT Management must not enter into any Access Agreement if the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage would (after including the tonnage under the new Access Agreement) exceed the System Capacity (as determined for a relevant time), unless otherwise required to do so by the Access Undertaking (including pursuant to Section 12.3), statute, or an agreement relating to its tenure of the Terminal including the Framework Agreement or the Port Services Agreement.
When the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage sought within the next 5 years by Applicants in a Queue cannot be met from Available System Capacity, such that a Terminal Capacity Expansion may be justified, DBCT Management will invite an offer from each Applicant in the Queue to enter into a Conditional Access Agreement.
DBCT Management will not be in breach of this Undertaking if it has complied with this Undertaking (or made good faith and reasonable attempts to comply) but the re-determination of System Capacity in accordance with Section 12.1(k) reveals that System Capacity is less than the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage at that time.
DBCT Management will not be in breach of this Undertaking if it has complied with this Undertaking (or made good faith and reasonable attempts to comply) but an assessment of System Capacity (after the assessment required by Section 12.1(k) following the completion of a relevant Terminal Capacity Expansion) reveals that System Capacity is less than the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage at that time.
If DBIM having completed a FEL 1 Feasibility Study and FEL 2 Feasibility Study, acting reasonably and consistently with prudent business practice concludes that Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage applied for in one or more Access Applications lodged with it, together with all other relevant circumstances, justify it undertaking a FEL 3 Feasibility Study, DBIM may, at its own cost, undertake a FEL 3 Feasibility Study.
DBIM must not enter into any Access Agreement if the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage would (after including the tonnage under the new Access Agreement) exceed the System Capacity (as determined for a relevant time), unless otherwise required to do so by the Access Undertaking (including pursuant to Section 12.3), statute, or an agreement relating to its tenure of the Terminal including the Framework Agreement or the Port Services Agreement.
DBCT Management must ensure that the each Access Holder is offered the opportunity to use a proportion of that stockpiling area which accords with its proportion of the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage under all Access Agreements and Existing User Agreements.
Unless otherwise required by the Port Services Agreement or Section 12 of this Undertaking, DBIM must not offer to enter into an Access Agreement for Annual Contract Tonnage which would result in Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage of all Access Holders exceeding the Available System Capacity at a relevant time.
DBCT Management will not be in breach of this Undertaking if it has complied with this Undertaking (or made good faith and reasonable attempts to comply) but an assessment of System Capacity (after the assessment required by Section 12.1(k) following the completion of a relevant TerminalCapacity Expansion) reveals that System Capacity is less than the Aggregate Annual Contract Tonnage at that time.