Examples of Arizona Courts in a sentence
A judgment to enforce the decision of the arbitrator whether for legal or equitable relief may be entered in any court having jurisdiction of the Arizona Courts for such purpose.
The sterile distilled water controls did show visual signs of infection two weeks post inoculation and could not be used reliably to differentiate volatile markers after day 7.
All copies of the data must be purged, updated, or restricted upon notice from the Arizona Courts and certified as such to the Arizona courts.
Each of the Borrower and the Lender hereby agree that all actions or proceedings initiated by the Borrower and arising directly or indirectly out of this Loan Agreement shall be litigated exclusively in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, or the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the "Arizona Courts"), and that any action initiated by the Lender and arising directly or indirectly out of this Loan Agreement may be litigated in any jurisdiction, at Lender's discretion.
Each party hereby agrees that all actions or proceedings initiated by Lessee and arising directly or indirectly out of this Lease shall be litigated exclusively in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, or the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (collectively the "Arizona Courts") and all actions or proceedings initiated by Lessor and arising directly or indirectly out of this Lease shall be litigated in any court in any jurisdiction chosen by Lessor in its sole discretion.
The Maker and the Lender hereby: (a) expressly submit and consent in advance to the jurisdiction and venue of the Arizona Courts in any action or proceeding commenced by the Maker or the Lender in any of the Arizona Courts, and (b) agree that jurisdiction and venue is proper in such courts.
The PCSC’s Language Access Plan is approved by the Presiding Judge and the Court Administrator as well as the Administrative Office of the Arizona Courts.
Arizona Courts have expressed that a duty may arise from either a relationship between the parties or a public policy consideration.
The Court held that “an employer is liable to a third person for injuries inflicted upon him by an employee who has been retained in employment after the employer knows, or [should] know, that because of his incompetency or vicious propensities he is likely to assault persons during the course of his employment”.74 Arizona Courts in Arizona have determined that the tort of negligent hiring is available to plaintiffs but only in limited circumstances.
Judgment to enforce the decision of the arbitrator, whether for legal or equitable relief, may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof, and the parties hereto expressly and irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the Arizona Courts for such purpose.