Examples of BP I in a sentence
Exchange gains may be offset against exchange losses during the implementation of the Project.
Given that internal arguments (of passives and unaccusatives, for example) can be post-verbal subjects freely in BP, I will focus on external arguments.
With services for children’s health, child care provision, young person training and family services the centre is likely to impact on several LAA targets.
CMS Comments 12 INTRODUCTION WHY WE DID THIS REVIEW The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (the Act) requires the Department of Health and Human Services (the Department) to use predictive modeling and other analytics technologies (fraud- detection models) to identify improper Medicare Fee-for-Service claims that providers submit and to prevent the payment of such claims.
If the amendment is not further clarified we will just be going from one extreme to the other in legal terms.Ms B.P.: I consider that the addition of the expression ‘l’usage privatif’ (‘for private use’) is pointless, since an EHPAD can easily be regarded as a private home (domicile), since the persons living there are in receipt of housing allocation.Mr Yves Bur: I shall see to it that the wording of the amendment guarantees that only EHPADs are excluded.
In a clinical study of patients with bipolar I or II disorder (BP I or BP II),26 brain phosphorus metabolism was measured by phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
The authors found that phosphocreatine levels were significantly lower in the BP II patients, regardless of the BD phase, than in a group of normal controls, suggesting that brain high-energy phosphate metabolism is impaired in BP II and that there are pathophysiological differences between BP I and BP II.To our knowledge, this is the first study of its type to include euthymic patients.
In 153 children and adolescents with bipolar NOS, as a result of short (hypo)manic episodes, 40% went on to meet standard duration criterion within 2.5 years of follow up, and neither family history nor disability distinguished them from youth with BP I disorder (Axelson et al, 2006; Birmaher et al, 2009).
In In re BP p.l.c. Securities Litigation (BP I), No. 10-MD-2185, 2013 WL 6388408, at *16–17 (S.D. Tex.
Because the plaintiffs’ model implied that investors were not relying on the integrity of the market price but instead on their own risk thresholds, their proposed model could not be “deployed without an individualized inquiry into each investor’s subjective motivations.” Id.Defendants first argue that Lead Plaintiffs, similar to the plaintiffs in BP I, “provide no ‘specifics of their proposed methodology,’ as required by law,” and on those grounds fail to meet Rule 23(b)(3).