Examples of Clean Air Mercury Rule in a sentence
In implementing the provisions of the Clean Air Mercury Rule in 40 CFR Part 60 Subparts Da and HHHH, the terms used in those subparts shall have the meanings defined in 40 CFR Part 60, provided, however, that the term Permitting Authority shall mean the Department, the term Hg Budget Trading Program shall mean 310 CMR 7.02 and 7.29, and the term Hg Budget Unit shall mean an EGU as defined in 40 CFR 60.24(h)(8).
No. EPA– 450/2–78–049b]; 5) Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Guidelines for Control of Existing Sources: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, 61 FR 9905 (March 12, 1996); and 6) Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, 70 FR 28606 (May 18, 2005) (hereafter, the Clean Air Mercury Rule or CAMR) (vacated in New Jersey v.
Additionally, we modeled reductions from rules that have since been vacated, like the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) and the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), though CAIR has since been remanded.
In addition, on May 18, 2005, the EPA issued the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR).
In March 2005, EPA issued its final Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) for coal-based power plants.
The IPM model was a key analytical tool used by EPA in developing CAIR and the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR).
Bush, EPA established a cap- and-trade system for control of mercury emissions under Section 111(d) (the Clean Air Mercury Rule) that did not require “physical or operational change to a building, structure, facility or installation at” each regulated source, but instead established statewide emissions budgets for mercury.
The rule, known as the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR), established, in relevant part, a nationwide cap-and-trade program under CAA section 111(d), which was designed to complement the cap-and-trade program for SO2 and NOX emissions under the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) .
EPA previously explained its approach in the Clean Air Mercury Rule as follows:On March 15, 2005, the EPA issued a rule to control mercury (Hg) emissions from new and existing fossil fuel-fired power plants under CAA section 111(b) and (d).
Dist., 541 U.S. 246, 252–53 (2004) (quoting Webster’s Second International Dictionary, at 2455 (1945))312 See ‘‘Standards of Performance for New and Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, Final Rule,’’ 70 FR 28,606 (May 18, 2005) [also known as the Clean Air Mercury Rule, or ‘‘CAMR’’], vacated on other grounds by New Jersey v.