Examples of Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights in a sentence
Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights may be awarded only to a Merchant D.C. Transmission Facility that connects the Transmission System with another control area.
Withdrawals scheduled using Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights have rights similar to those under Firm Point-to- Point Transmission Service.
Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights and Non-Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights.
Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights may be awarded only to a Merchant D.C. TransmissionFacility that connects the Transmission System with another control area.
Withdrawals scheduled using Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights have rights similar to those under Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service.
Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights and Non-Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights.1.49A.01 Upgrade Construction Service Agreement: That agreement entered into by a New Service Customer (other than an Interconnection Customer whose project includes generation capability or Merchant Transmission Facilities other than Merchant Network Upgrades), a Transmission Owner, and the Transmission Provider, pursuant to Subpart B of Part VI of the Tariff, and in the form set forth in Attachment GG of the Tariff.
For the remaining load buses, the voltage angle deviation will be multiplied by the megawatt load at the bus obtained from the stability simulation model, or, in the case of a Merchant Transmission Facility, the Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights at the bus.
As the system changes for a variety of reasons (e.g., retirements and load growth), it may be necessary to construct additional facilities in order for PJM to be able to provide the level of Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights to which the customers subscribed.
The Company also leases operating facilities in Smith Center, KS from an individual.
Linden states neither PJM’s tariff nor the Existing ISA contain conditions or other requirements for the reduction of Firm Transmission Withdrawal Rights, which it notes is reasonable provided this reduction alleviates a burden on PJM’s system.32 NYPA also argues that requiring HTP to negotiate with PSEG rather than PJM over the status of these rights would confuse the interconnection parties’ roles in the Existing ISA.