Examples of Japanese Securities in a sentence
APPENDIX G – FAILURE TO DELIVER OF JAPANESE GOVERNMENT SECURITIES In August 2010, the Japanese Securities Dealers Association (“JSDA”) announced that “The Japanese Government Securities Guidelines for Real Time Gross Settlement” will be partially amended and that the “Practical Guidelines for Handling of Fails Charges” will be implemented.
If an Event of Default does not relate to Insolvency Proceedings or it relates to Bankruptcy Proceedings, a pledge over Japanese Securities or cash in a Japanese Account would be enforceable in a timely manner under Japanese law.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Japanese Securities and Exchange Law and its related accounting regulations, and in conformity with accounting principles and practices generally accepted in Japan, which are different in certain respects as to application and disclosure requirements of International Accounting Standards.
Under Japanese law, the validity of the perfection of the transfer of title to the Japanese Securities is governed by the law governing ownership interests in such securities, as determined by Japanese conflict of laws rules.
Any failure to comply with this restriction may constitute a violation of United States, Canadian, Australian or Japanese Securities laws.
Therefore, a pledge over Japanese Securities or cash in a Japanese Account would be enforceable in a timely manner (see our response to question 16 in Part 1).
The Collateral Provider enters into with Collateral Taker an ISDA Master Agreement governed by English law and a Japanese Annex, and transfers to Collateral Taker Eligible Credit Support consisting of Japanese Securities, Outside Securities or cash, and such securities or cash is transferred to a Japanese Account or an Outside Account.
The purpose of the Japanese Securities and Exchange Law is to accomplish the fairness in issuance, trading and other transactions of securities related transactions, in order to protect investors.
This would be the equivalent to $120 billion a year in the United States (Japanese Securities Research 1992, p 244).
However, there is no provision of the relevant laws which allows or obligates the Japanese Courts to cooperate with such incomplete proceeding and therefore the Japanese Court will not apply the laws of the Home Jurisdiction in deciding the enforceability of the Loan and Set-off Method or the pledge over a Japanese Securities or cash in a Japanese Account.