Peer Review Policy definition

Peer Review Policy means the policy and procedure adopted by the Medical Staff with the approval of the Board to provide evidence of objective monitoring of quality concerns for clinical management and evaluation of outcomes, provide oversight of the professional performance of all practitioners with delineated clinical privileges, evaluate the competence of practitioner performance, establish guidelines and triggers for referring cases identified or suspected as variations from quality indicators, and facilitate delivery of quality services that meet professionally recognized standards. This policy is incorporated into these Bylaws and is contained in Appendix “D” hereto.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Peer Review Policy means the policy and procedure adopted by the Medical Staff with the approval of the Board and is incorporated into these Bylaws and is contained in Appendix “D” hereto.
Sample 1Sample 2

Examples of Peer Review Policy in a sentence

  • As part of a determination that members of committees and panels are objective and open-minded on the topic of the review, and consistent with the agency’s Peer Review Policy, the SAB Staff Office considers previous involvement in the matter before the committee or panel.

  • In accordance with the Munson Healthcare System Peer Review Policy and Charter, the individual specifically authorizes Munson Healthcare Entities to share credentialing, peer review, and other information and documentation pertaining to the individual’s clinical competence, professional conduct and health.

  • If the Board denies an Applicant’s re-credentialing application, the Applicant may appeal the decision pursuant to the Peer Review Policy.

  • For the re-credentialing process, the Credentials Committee will review information received during the prior periods of participation, in accordance with the Peer Review Policy, and information relating to compliance with the Network Participation Agreement and the Clinical Integration Program.

  • Subsequent violations that occur in the same rolling calendar year as the initial violation shall be reported to the Chief of Staff to be addressed in accordance with the Medical Staff Conduct Policy and to the Medical Staff Peer Review Committee to be addressed in accordance with the Medical Staff Peer Review Policy.

  • Details of the monitoring process are outlined in the Focused Professional Practice Evaluation Medical Staff Policy and Procedure and the Medical Staff Peer Review Policy and Procedure.

  • These include: • Peer Review – including the arrangements in place for peer review under the University’s Peer Review Policy Framework;• Signing Authority on Research Grant Applications - including the requirements in place for approval of research grant applications prior to submission to relevant funder;• Registration of Research Projects - provides details on the requirements in place for registration of research projects.

  • Validation timescales within Community services should be as soon as possible but within the timescales identified within Trust’s, NTW(C)31 - Clinical Supervision and Peer Review Policy, within one calendar month.

  • For each, this preamble discusses EPA’s data collection efforts, how the Agency developed estimates of costs from that data, and how it developed the resulting formula.169 EPA has followed the Agency’s Peer Review Policy with respect to the underlying formula supporting this action.

  • This Agreement shall be construed as a separate agreement with respect to each party hereto, and the provisions of this Agreement shall not be waived, amended or modified except in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 7.1 of the Collateral Trust Agreement.

Related to Peer Review Policy

  • Peer review means evaluation of professional services rendered by a professional practitioner.

  • Peer review committee means one or more persons acting in a peer review capacity who also serve as an officer, director, trustee, agent, or member of any of the following:

  • Utilization review plan or "plan" means a written procedure for performing review.

  • Peer-reviewed medical literature means a scientific study published only after having been critically

  • Review Package A package of documents consisting of a memorandum outlining the analysis and recommendation (in accordance with the Servicing Standard) of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, with respect to the matters that are the subject thereof, and copies of all relevant documentation.

  • Review Panel means a panel responsible for determining whether a reasonable basis exists for finding a violation of BSEF Rules, and for authorizing the issuance of notices of chargers against Persons alleged to have committed violations if the Review Panel believes that the matter should be adjudicated.

  • Quality Assurance Program means the overall quality program and associated activities including the Department’s Quality Assurance, Design-Builder Quality Control, the Contract’s quality requirements for design and construction to assure compliance with Department Specifications and procedures.

  • Review Criteria has the meaning assigned to that term in Section 12.02(b)(i).

  • Over-Riding Nomination Criteria means the criteria set out in clause 4.2.

  • Basic health plan model plan means a health plan as required in RCW 70.47.060(2)(e).

  • Architectural Review Committee or “ARC” shall mean the architectural review committee established by the Organization to review plans submitted to the Organization for architectural review.

  • Performance Review means a summative evaluation of a teacher other than a beginning teacher and used to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations and the Iowa teaching standards, and to determine whether the teacher’s practice meets school district expectations for career advancement in accordance with Iowa Code section 284.7.

  • Clinical review criteria means the written screening procedures, decision abstracts, clinical protocols, and practice guidelines used by a health carrier to determine the necessity and appropriateness of health care services.

  • independent review committee means the independent review committee of the investment fund established under National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds;

  • Valuation manual means the manual of valuation instructions adopted by the NAIC as specified in this section or as subsequently amended.

  • Medical Review Officer (MRO means a licensed physician, employed with or contracted with the City, responsible for receiving laboratory results generated by the City's drug testing program who has knowledge of substance abuse disorders, laboratory testing procedures, and chain of custody collection procedures; who verifies positive, confirmed test results, and who has the necessary and appropriate medical training to interpret and evaluate an individual's confirmed positive test result together with his or her medical history and any other relevant biomedical information.

  • Peer support specialist means an individual who has experienced a severe and persistent mental illness and who has successfully completed standardized training to provide peer support services through the medical assistance program or the Iowa Behavioral Health Care Plan.

  • Retrospective review means a review of medical necessity conducted after services have been provided to a patient, but does not include the review of a claim that is limited to an evaluation of reimbursement levels, veracity of documentation, accuracy of coding, or adjudication for payment.

  • Benchmark Review means a review of the Services carried out in accordance with paragraphs 2.1 to 2.3 of Schedule 7 (Value for Money) of this Framework Agreement to determine whether those Services represent Good Value;

  • Supervisory Review means ongoing clinical case reviews in accordance with procedures developed by ADMINISTRATOR, to determine the appropriateness of Diagnosis and treatment and to monitor compliance to the minimum ADMINISTRATOR and Medi-Cal charting standards. Supervisory review is conducted by the program/clinic director or designee.

  • Basic Comprehensive User Guide means the Ministry document titled Basic Comprehensive Certificates of Approval (Air) User Guide” dated April 2004 as amended.

  • Architectural Control Committee means and refer to that committee constituted under Article 4 hereof for the review of Development Plans (as hereinafter defined) and other functions.

  • CMSA Bond Level File means the monthly report substantially in the form of, and containing the information called for in, the downloadable form of the "Bond Level File" available as of the Closing Date on the CMSA Website, or such other form for the presentation of such information and containing such additional information as may from time to time be approved by the CMSA for commercial mortgage securities transactions generally.

  • Evaluation Committee means a body appointed to perform the evaluation of Offerors’ proposals.

  • Credentials Committee means the committee established by the Medical Advisory Committee to review applications for appointment and reappointment to the Professional Staff and to make recommendations to the Medical Advisory Committee and if no such committee is established it shall mean the Medical Advisory Committee;

  • Grievance Committee means the Grievance Committee of the Bar.