Examples of Primary Proceeding in a sentence
Foreign firms are limited to a maximum one-third ownership stake in joint venture securities businesses.
Director shall give KCD (a) notice in writing as soon as possible of any claim made against Director for which indemnity will or could be sought under this Agreement and (b) such information and cooperation (including executing documents and instruments) as KCD may reasonably request in connection with any Primary Proceeding or Derivative Proceeding.
KCD shall indemnify Director against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with a Primary Proceeding, but only if (a) Director acted in good faith and in a manner that Director reasonably believed to be in the best interests of KCD and (b) in the case of a criminal proceeding, Director had no reasonable cause to believe that Director's conduct was unlawful.
To the extent that Director is successful on the merits in defense of any Primary Proceeding or Derivative Proceeding, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter in such a proceeding, KCD shall indemnify Director against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by Director in connection with it.
We have sought the necessary legal advice on the above matter and our solicitors are of the opinion that SRSB has a good case in defending GKCSB’s claim in the Primary Proceeding on the basis that the allegation made by GKCSB is time barred pursuant to the limitation period of two years for tort under Item 19 of the Schedule of Sarawak Limitation Ordinance.
B7 Material Litigation (cont’d) We had sought the necessary legal advice on the above matter and our solicitors are of the opinion that SRSB has a good case in defending GKCSB’s claim in the Primary Proceeding on the basis that the allegation made by GKCSB is time barred pursuant to the limitation period of two (2) years for tort under Item 19 of the Schedule of Sarawak Limitation Ordinance.
We had sought the necessary legal advice on the above matter and our solicitors are of the opinion that SRSB has a good case in defending GKCSB’s claim in the Primary Proceeding on the basis that the allegation made by GKCSB is time barred pursuant to the limitation period of two (2) years for tort under Item 19 of the Schedule of Sarawak Limitation Ordinance.
It is clear that the 2021 EGM Resolutions were intended to bring the Primary Proceeding to an end and to replace the Agreement with the Replacement Resort Management Agreement.
It follows therefore, in my view, that Waydanette as the occupier of Lot 1 is directly affected by the decision made by the strata company to bring the Primary Proceeding which was an 98 Closing submissions of the strata company filed on 28 March 2022 at para 93.
For the reasons which follow, the application in the Primary Proceeding is unsuccessful, the application in the Secondary Proceeding is partly successful and the application in the Tertiary Proceeding is successful.