Examples of Proposed Business Combination in a sentence
If the Purchaser fails to vote any Class A Shares it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants hereunder to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
If the Purchaser fails to vote any Class B Shares or Class A Shares it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
If the Purchaser fails to vote any Class A Shares it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
If the Purchaser fails to vote any Class B Shares or Class A Shares it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants hereunder to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
If the Purchaser fails to vote any shares of Class A Common Stock it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants hereunder to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
Without limiting the foregoing, it is understood that the obligations under clause (a) in this Section 5 shall remain applicable in respect of each meeting of shareholders of the Company duly called for the purpose of approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, regardless of the position of the Company’s board of directors as to the Proposed Business Combination at the time of such meeting.
If the Purchaser fails to vote any Class A Ordinary Shares it is required to vote hereunder in favor of a Proposed Business Combination, the Purchaser hereby grants to the Company and any representative designated by the Company without further action by the Purchaser a limited irrevocable power of attorney to effect such vote on behalf of the Purchaser, which power of attorney shall be deemed to be coupled with an interest.
Without limiting the foregoing, it is understood that the obligations in this Section 4 shall remain applicable in respect of each meeting of shareholders of the Company duly called for the purpose of approving the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, regardless of the position of the Company’s board of directors as to the Proposed Business Combination at the time of such meeting.
Contingent upon the substantially concurrent consummation of the closing of the Proposed Business Combination, the settlement of the forward purchase contract for the purchase and sale of the PubCo Forward Purchase Securities hereunder (the “FP Closing”) shall occur immediately following the Initial Merger Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and immediately prior to the SPAC Merger Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement).
It frustrates the full purpose and objectives of Congress in enacting the Williams Act by: (a) giving intransigent management the ability to defeat a noncoercive proposal without a vote by shareholders, (b) impermissibly tilting the balance between management and a potential acquirer in the context of a noncoercive proposal, and (c) depriving Plaintiff of its right to have AMP shareholders consider the Proposed Business Combination under federal law.