Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement Sample Clauses

Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (340)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. The Principal Investigator agrees that, if he or she becomes an Approved User, information about the PI and the approved research use may be posted on a public, US government web site that describes approved research projects. The information may include the Approved User’s name and institution, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, citations resulting from the use of NIH genomic datasets may be posted on NIH data repository websites.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. PIs agree that if they become Approved Users, information about themselves and their approved research use will be posted publicly on the NIAGADS website. The information includes the Approved User’s name and institution, project name, research use statement, and a non-technical summary of the research use statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the NIAGADS website.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. PIs agree that if they become Approved Users, information about themselves and their approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the Approved User’s name and institution, project name, research use statement, and a non-technical summary of the research use statement. Security Best Practices Requirements. Note that any scientific collaborators, including contactors, who are not at the same institution as the PI must submit their own DAR. In addition, citations of publications resulting from the use of NIH genomic datasets may be posted on NIH data repository websites.
Sample 1
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. The PI agrees that if he or she becomes an Approved User, information about the PI and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the FaceBase website, as well as a public, U.S. government website that describes approved research projects. The information may include the Approved User’s name and institution, project name, and Specific Aims as described in the DAR. Citations of publications resulting from the use of FaceBase datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the FaceBase and relevant NIDCR websites.
Sample 1
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. The Qualified Investigator agrees that, if the DAR is approved, information about all Approved Users and the approved research use will be posted on the CIFASD website as well as on public, US government websites that describe approved research projects. The information may include the names and institutions of the Approved User(s), project name, and Goals/Aims as described in the DAR. In addition, citations resulting from the use of CIFASD datasets may be posted on the CIFASD and relevant National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) websites.
Sample 1
Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement. The RECIPIENT and PI agree that information about the proposed research use can be posted on a public web site that describes the project(s) included in the RESEARCH PLAN. The information will include the PI’s name, RECIPIENT institution, project title, and a brief summary of the research. In addition, citations resulting from the use of Research Materials may be posted on the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center Website.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2018, the District will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the District to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the District, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the District’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor, or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the District will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Public Posting of DPA Pursuant to SOPPA, the LEA shall publish on its website a copy of the DPA between the Provider and the LEA, including this Exhibit G.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Boycotting Israel (Tex Gov. Code 2271)

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Requester and Approved User Responsibilities The Requester agrees through the submission of the DAR that the PI named has reviewed and understands the principles for responsible research use and data management of the genomic datasets as defined in the NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the GDS Policy. The Requester and Approved Users further acknowledge that they are responsible for ensuring that all uses of the data are consistent with national, tribal, and state laws and regulations, as appropriate, as well as relevant institutional policies and procedures for managing sensitive genomic and phenotypic data. The Requester certifies that the PI is in good standing (i.e., no known sanctions) with the institution, relevant funding agencies, and regulatory agencies and is eligible to conduct independent research (i.e., is not a postdoctoral fellow, student, or trainee). The Requester and any Approved Users may use the dataset(s) only in accordance with the parameters described on the study page and in the 1 If contractor services are to be utilized, PI requesting the data must provide a brief description of the services that the contractor will perform for the PI (e.g., data cleaning services) in the research use statement of the DAR. Additionally, the Key Personnel section of the DAR must include the name of the contractor’s employee(s) who will conduct the work. These requirements apply whether the contractor carries out the work at the PI’s facility or at the contractor’s facility. In addition, the PI is expected to include in any contract agreement requirements to ensure that any of the contractor’s employees who have access to the data adhere to the NIH GDS Policy, this Data Use Certification Agreement, and the NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the GDS Policy. Note that any scientific collaborators, including contractors, who are not at the Requester must submit their own DAR. Addendum to this Agreement for the appropriate research use, as well as any limitations on such use, of the dataset(s), as described in the DAR, and as required by law. Through the submission of this DAR, the Requester and Approved Users acknowledge receiving and reviewing a copy of the Addendum which includes Data Use Limitation(s) for each dataset requested. The Requester and Approved Users agree to comply with the terms listed in the Addendum. Through submission of the DAR, the PI and Requester agree to submit a Project Renewal or Project Close-out prior to the expiration date of the one (1) year data access period. The PI also agrees to submit an annual Progress Update prior to the one (1) year anniversary2 of the project, as described under Research Use Reporting (Term 10) below. By approving and submitting the attached DAR, the Institutional Signing Official provides assurance that relevant institutional policies and applicable local, state, tribal, and federal laws and regulations, as applicable, have been followed, including IRB approval, if required. Approved Users may be required to have IRB approval if they have access to personal identifying information for research participants in the original study at their institution, or through their collaborators. The Institutional Signing Official also assures, through the approval of the DAR, that other institutional departments with relevant authorities (e.g., those overseeing human subjects research, information technology, technology transfer) have reviewed the relevant sections of the NIH GDS Policy and the associated procedures and are in agreement with the principles defined. The Requester acknowledges that controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy may be updated to exclude or include additional information. Unless otherwise indicated, all statements herein are presumed to be true and applicable to the access and use of all versions of these datasets.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!