Examples of Relative VaR Approach in a sentence
The risk resulting from the use of financial derivative in- struments may be calculated based on the Commitment Approach or by making use of the Relative VaR Approach or Absolute VaR Approach as detailed for each Sub-Fund in the Special Part.
Market risk exposure and risk management As part of the risk management process, each Portfolio uses one of the following methodologies to monitor and measure its global exposure, each as disclosed below: (i) the Commitment Approach, (ii) the Relative VaR Approach; or (iii) the Absolute VaR Approach.
This study will give a good overview of pure collaborative filtering and content-based recommendation methods.
The risk resulting from the use of financial derivative instruments may be calculated based on the Commitment Approach or by making use of the Relative VaR Approach or Absolute VaR Approach as detailed for each Sub- Fund in the Supplement.
Relative VaR Approach: In the relative VaR approach, the VaR of the relevant Sub-Fund shall not exceed twice the VaR of a reference portfolio.
The Company shall also assess on a regular basis the quality of the VaR model forecasts by means of a comparison between the potential market risk amount calculated by the model and the actual change in the value of the portfolio (back-testing).The Company’s total exposure limit relating to a Sub-Fund of 200% of NAV, may be alternatively assessed on the basis of the Absolute VaR Approach or the Relative VaR Approach.
The risk resulting from the use of financial derivative instruments may be calculated based on the Commitment Approach or by making use of the Relative VaR Approach or Absolute VaR Approach as detailed for each Portfolio in the Supplement.
Relative VaR Approach – Under the Relative VaR Approach, the VaR on a Sub-Fund’s portfolio should be compared with the VaR of a benchmark or reference portfolio (i.e. a similar portfolio with no FDIs) in the form of an actual benchmark portfolio (such as an index) or a fictitious benchmark portfolio.
Knowledge was broadly defined as "the basic information whose status is qualified in one way or another by markers of evidentiality", where the notion of evidentiality extends beyond evidence and can be as inclusive as any "attitude toward knowledge" (Chafe 1986).
If the VaR on the Sub-Fund’s portfolio is within 20% of the NAV then the global exposure limit described above is deemed to be satisfied.Relative VaR Approach – Under the Relative VaR Approach, the VaR on a Sub-Fund’s portfolio should be compared with the VaR of a benchmark or reference portfolio (i.e. a similar portfolio with no FDIs) in the form of an actual benchmark portfolio (such as an index) or a fictitious benchmark portfolio.