Examples of Removal Efficiency in a sentence
If air handlers are used during construction, the Lessor shall provide filtration media with a MERV of 8 at each return air grill, as determined by the latest edition of ASHRAE Standard 52.2, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
Air filtration shall be provided and maintained with filters having a minimum efficiency rating as determined by the latest edition of ASHRAE Standard 52.2, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
HVAC during Construction: If air handlers are used during construction, the Lessor shall provide filtration media with a MERV of 8 at each return air grill, as determined by the latest edition of ASHRAE Standard 52.2, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
You must calculate the semivolatile metal feedrate limit as the semivolatile metal emission stand- ard divided by [1 ¥ System Removal Efficiency].
Any secondary filtration systems (such as in heat pumps) shall have a minimum weight arrestance of eighty (80) percent as rated by ASHRAE 52.2, or as amended, Weight Arrestance Method or Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 5 as rated by ASHRAE 52.2, or as amended, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
A new 30-Day Rolling Average Removal Efficiency shall be calculated for each new Operating Day.
The test duct is operated following procedures in the ANSI/ASHRAE (American National Standards Institute/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Standard 52.2-1999, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
Data from the inlet and outlet SO2 monitors for each unit have been used to calculate the 30-Day Rolling Average Removal Efficiency in accordance the requirements and using the calculations set forth in Part II of Appendix C of the Consent Decree.
Pursuant to Paragraph 87 of the Consent Decree, the existing FGDs on Conesville Units 5 and 6 were upgraded to achieve a 95% 30-Day Rolling Average Removal Efficiency beginning December 31, 2009.
Consequently, it is very difficult to compare the performance of different packing materials on the basis of the Elimination Capacity (EC in g m-3 h-1) measured at different EBRTs and the Removal Efficiency (RE), which can be other than 100%.