Examples of Trial for Guilt in a sentence
The grounds for appeal of the verdict in the Trial for Guilt and the Trial for Sanction are the same as the grounds for appeal of UJC verdicts to the JRB, as provided in Section B above.
UJC Trials are divided into two phases, if applicable, the first of which is the Trial for Guilt, and the second of which is the Trial for Sanction.
In the event that a subsequent Complaint is filed alleging the triggering conduct, the Sanctioned Student or Sanctioned Group (“Sanctioned”) shall be entitled to a Trial for Guilt to determine whether or not, beyond a reasonable doubt, such conduct occurred, and a Trial for Sanction, to determine the nature and extent of the Sanction or Sanctions to be activated.
Ensure submission of the Investigator’s Report for each trial, together with other pertinent information, including the outcomes of both the Trial for Guilt and the Trial for Sanction, to the Vice President for review, and, where applicable, to the JRB for review.
In case of disagreement with the resolution, the interested parties can lodge a higher appeal before the Official Commission of Post grade Studies, which exhausts the administrative procedure.
In such cases, if the Trial Chair determines that the consequences of this admission are accepted and understood, there shall be no Trial for Guilt, and the Trial for Sanction shall commence immediately.
If the admission is to some, but not all, of the charges in the Complaint, the Trial for Guilt shall commence as to the charges still at issue (unless the Complainant agrees to accept such partial admission of guilt, in which case the Trial may move to a Trial for Sanction).
The Trial for Guilt and the Trial for Sanction each shall commence with an opening statement by the Complainant, followed by an opening statement by the Accused Student or Accused Group.
Trial for Guilt: All relevant evidence is admissible at the Trial for Guilt, except for evidence which, in the reasonable discretion of the Trial Chair, (i) is highly prejudicial, meaning that such evidence would unfairly bias the Judges, (ii) is plainly redundant, or (iii) relates to the Past Disciplinary Record of the Accused.
All relevant evidence is admissible at the Trial for Guilt, except for evidence which, in the reasonable discretion of the Trial Chair, (i) is highly prejudicial, meaning that such evidence would unfairly bias the Judges, (ii) is plainly redundant, or (iii) relates to the Past Disciplinary Record of the Accused.