AAM's Review of Remedial Plans Sample Clauses

AAM's Review of Remedial Plans. GM will provide AAM with a copy of the proposed Remedial Plan(s), as may be amended from time to time, subject to the terms of the ECA for undertaking and completing investigation, cleanup, remediation, and/or other actions to address Pre-Closing Environmental Conditions under Section 6.1.2.A. or 6.1.3. AAM will have the right to review and comment on such Remedial Plan(s) prior to implementation by GM. GM will cooperate reasonably with AAM in facilitating AAM's review of the Remedial Plan(s). GM will consider AAM's comments on the Remedial Plans and, if requested by AAM, discuss AAM's comments on the Remedial Plans with AAM. AAM will complete its review promptly, but in no event will AAM's review period exceed thirty (30) calendar days after AAM's receipt of any Remedial Plan unless additional time is reasonably required. Any requests for additional time must be made in writing within the review period; provided, however, that in the event that a shorter time for review is made necessary as a result of the need to obtain the approval of a governmental agency or as a result of a requirement of a governmental agency, then AAM's review time will be shortened to a period which is reasonable under the circumstances as specified by GM. If AAM does not object to the Remedial Plan(s) within the review period, GM will implement the Remedial Plan(s) as proposed or modified to address comments or objections from AAM consistent with this Section 6.1.2.F and as the Remedial Plan(s) may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding any comments by AAM on the Remedial Plan(s), any objection to the Remedial Plan(s) by AAM must be timely and must be based solely upon a showing by AAM that an action(s) set forth in the Remedial Plan(s) will significantly and materially impair the ability of AAM to produce products in the ordinary course of business as conducted by GM before the date of Closing. If AAM makes such a showing, GM will modify its Remedial Plan(s) so as to not significantly and materially impair the ability of AAM to produce products in the ordinary course of business as conducted by GM before the date of Closing. Notwithstanding and without limiting the foregoing, AAM may not object to any Remedial Plan: (i) because a different action(s) might take a shorter period of time, require less of a presence of GM or its representatives at the Real Property, as defined in Section 1.1.1., or be preferable to AAM; (ii) to require action(s) more stringent or materially di...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to AAM's Review of Remedial Plans

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Periodic Review of Costs of Environmental Compliance In the ordinary course of its business, the Company conducts a periodic review of the effect of Environmental Laws on the business, operations and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated costs and liabilities (including, without limitation, any capital or operating expenditures required for clean-up, closure of properties or compliance with Environmental Laws or any permit, license or approval, any related constraints on operating activities and any potential liabilities to third parties). On the basis of such review and the amount of its established reserves, the Company has reasonably concluded that such associated costs and liabilities would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • SITE VISITS AND RECORD REVIEW The Applicant shall allow authorized employees of the District, the Comptroller, the Appraisal District, and the State Auditor’s Office to have reasonable access to the Applicant’s Qualified Property and business records from the Application Review Start Date through the Final Termination Date, in order to inspect the project to determine compliance with the terms hereof or as necessary to properly appraise the Taxable Value of the Applicant’s Qualified Property. A. All inspections will be made at a mutually agreeable time after the giving of not less than ninety-six (96) hours prior written notice, and will be conducted in such a manner so as not to unreasonably interfere with either the construction or operation of the Applicant’s Qualified Property. B. All inspections may be accompanied by one or more representatives of the Applicant, and shall be conducted in accordance with the Applicant’s safety, security, and operational standards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Agreement shall require the Applicant to provide the District, the Comptroller, or the Appraisal District with any technical or business information that is proprietary, a trade secret, or is subject to a confidentiality agreement with any third party.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!