Common use of Academic Integrity Clause in Contracts

Academic Integrity. 25.1 It is a condition of accepting funding that the Research Institution has in place a viable mechanism for dealing with accusations of scientific fraud. In the event of suspected scientific fraud, Prostate Cancer UK requires the Research Institution to investigate and provide a written report to Prostate Cancer UK of the findings of such investigations within six months of the irregularity or fraud occurring or being suspected. 25.2 If academic fraud is suspected during the course of research on the Project, Prostate Cancer UK must be notified immediately and kept informed in writing of further developments. Prostate Cancer UK reserves the right to suspend, terminate or clawback all or part of the Grant if, in the opinion of Prostate Cancer UK, satisfactory steps are not taken to investigate allegations of academic fraud. If fraud or any other irregularity is proven against the Research Institution, Prostate Cancer UK will terminate the Grant immediately and Grant monies already paid will become repayable immediately in whole. 25.3 A viable mechanism for dealing with accusations of scientific fraud or other academic irregularities must contain the following elements: a guidance document or code of practice on standards of professional behaviour; provisions for induction and training of staff; monitoring; regulations and procedures for handling allegations; fair procedures and appropriate protection for both the accused and the accuser. The Research Institution undertakes to have such a mechanism in place for the duration of the Grant Period.