Common use of Appeal Process Clause in Contracts

Appeal Process. 1. Employees who claim that SCP procedures were not followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that they were not evaluated according to the performance standards for their job, may seek review only as described below, which shall be the sole and exclusive remedy and appeal for such claim. The judgment that forms the basis of whether an employee is evaluated as “meets standards” or “does not meet standards” and the size of a salary increase pursuant to the SCP shall be at the sole and exclusive discretion of the University and not subject to the above appeal process. 2. The employee may initiate a review within 30 days of receipt of the salary notification letter from University Human Resources or notification by the department where there is no salary change. The employee must inform his or her immediate supervisor in writing on a SCP Review Request Form available from University Human Resources of the claim that procedures have not have been followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that he/she was not evaluated according to the performance standards for the job. The supervisor must provide a written response to the employee within 30 days of receipt of the employee’s completed Review Request Form. 3. If the employee is not satisfied with the supervisor’s written response, the employee may, within 30 days of receipt of the supervisor’s written response, request in writing a review of the matter by the xxxx, director or department head who shall meet with the employee and provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. 4. If the employee is not satisfied with the written response by the xxxx, director or department head, he or she may within 30 days request in writing a review of the matter by the Vice President or Xxxxxxx (or designee) for the employee’s area who will provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. In all cases, the decision of the Vice President or Xxxxxxx is final. 5. At each level, the employee shall provide a copy of all prior requests for review and prior written responses.

Appeal Process. 1. Employees who claim that SCP procedures were not followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that they were not evaluated according to the performance standards for their job, may seek review only as described below, which shall be the sole and exclusive remedy and appeal for such claim. The judgment that forms the basis of whether an employee is evaluated as “meets standards” or “does not meet standards” and the size of a salary increase pursuant to the SCP shall be at the sole and exclusive discretion of the University and not subject to the above appeal process. 2. The employee may initiate a review within 30 days of receipt of the salary notification letter from University Human Resources or notification by the department where there is no salary changeperformance evaluation. The employee must inform his or her their immediate supervisor in writing on a SCP Review Request Form available from University Human Resources of the claim that procedures have not have been followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that he/she was they were not evaluated according to the performance standards for the job. The supervisor must provide a written response to the employee within 30 days of receipt of the employee’s completed Review Request Form. 3. If the employee is not satisfied with the supervisor’s written response, the employee may, within 30 days of receipt of the supervisor’s written response, request in writing a review of the matter by the xxxx, director or department head who shall meet with the employee and provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. 4. If the employee is not satisfied with the written response by the xxxx, director or department head, he or she the employee may within 30 days request in writing a review of the matter by the Vice President or Xxxxxxx (or designee) for the employee’s area who will provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. In all cases, the decision of the Vice President or Xxxxxxx is final. 5. At each level, the employee shall provide a copy of all prior requests for review and prior written responses.prior

Appeal Process. 1. Employees who claim that SCP procedures were not followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that they were not evaluated according to the performance standards for their job, may seek review only as described below, which shall be the sole and exclusive remedy and appeal for such claim. The judgment that forms the basis of whether an employee is evaluated as “meets standards” or “does not meet standards” and the size of a salary increase pursuant to the SCP shall be at the sole and exclusive discretion of the University and not subject to the above appeal process. 2. The employee may initiate a review within 30 days of receipt of the salary notification letter from University Human Resources or notification by the department where there is no salary changeperformance evaluation. The employee must inform his or her immediate supervisor in writing on a SCP Review Request Form available from University Human Resources of the claim that procedures have not have been followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that he/she was not evaluated according to the performance standards for the job. The supervisor must provide a written response to the employee within 30 days of receipt of the employee’s completed Review Request Form. 3. If the employee is not satisfied with the supervisor’s written response, the employee may, within 30 days of receipt of the supervisor’s written response, request in writing a review of the matter by the xxxx, director or department head who shall meet with the employee and provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. 4. If the employee is not satisfied with the written response by the xxxx, director or department head, he or she may within 30 days request in writing a review of the matter by the Vice President or Xxxxxxx (or designee) for the employee’s area who will provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. In all cases, the decision of the Vice President or Xxxxxxx is final. 5. At each level, the employee shall provide a copy of all prior requests for review and prior written responses.

Appeal Process. 1. a. Employees who claim that SCP IAFFCP procedures were not followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that they were not evaluated according to the performance standards for their job, may seek review only as described below, which shall be the sole and exclusive remedy and appeal for such claim. The judgment that forms the basis of whether an employee is evaluated as “meets standards” or “does not meet standards” and the size of a salary increase pursuant to the SCP IAFFCP shall be at the sole and exclusive discretion of the University and not subject to the above appeal process. 2. b. The employee may initiate a review within 30 days of receipt of the salary notification letter from University Human Resources or notification by the department where there is no salary change. The employee must inform his or her immediate supervisor in writing on a SCP an IAFFCP Review Request Form available from University Human Resources of the claim that procedures have not have been followed, that there was a demonstrable factual inconsistency in the employee’s evaluation, or that he/she was not evaluated according to the performance standards for the job. The supervisor must provide a written response to the employee within 30 days of receipt of the employee’s completed Review Request Form. 3. c. If the employee is not satisfied with the supervisor’s written response, the employee may, within 30 days of receipt of the supervisor’s written response, request in writing a review of the matter by the xxxx, director or department head who shall meet with the employee and provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. 4. d. If the employee is not satisfied with the written response by the xxxx, director or department head, he or she may within 30 days request in writing a review of the matter by the Vice President or Xxxxxxx (or designee) for the employee’s area who will provide a written response within 30 days of receiving the request for review. In all cases, the decision of the Vice President or Xxxxxxx is final. 5. e. At each level, the employee shall provide a copy of all prior requests for review and prior written responses.