Cognitive interdependence and performance Sample Clauses

Cognitive interdependence and performance. Cognitive interdependence is defined as informal relationships among team members in which task-related knowledge is disseminated (Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx & Xxxxx, 2001; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxxx, 2002). The construct of cognitive interdependence is closely related to what is labeled in the organizational psychology literature as shared mental models (e.g., Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxxx, 2002), team situation awareness (e.g., Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx, 1995), transactive memory systems (e.g., Xxxxxxx, 1995) and collective mind (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 1993). Although conceptually different, these terms all refer to a socially constructed cognitive structure that represents shared knowledge or beliefs about an environment and its expected behavior (Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxxx, 2002). The sharing of task-related knowledge, for example via the exchange of advice, guidance, or the discussion of new ideas, gives form and coherence to the experience of group members and helps them with the completion of their work (Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2001). The more task-related knowledge gets shared among team members, the more nonredundant pieces of information are likely to be shared (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2001) which benefits the quality of decision making in groups (e.g., Henningsen & Henningsen, 2003; Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 1998). When most (or all) group members share nonredundant task-related information, the anticipation of each other’s actions and needs is enabled (Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 1993), which in turn improves the alignment of individual actions and hence, facilitates coordinated action (Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 1994) and group effectiveness (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2000). In addition, the more cognitive interdependence in a group (i.e., the more task-related knowledge is disseminated via advice or discussion) the more each group member learns about other group member’s tasks, roles and responsibilities (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2001). Knowing what fellow team members do enhances the visibility of individual contributions to the group task (Xxxx, 1964) and at the same time clarifies expectations and accountability (cf. Xxxxxxxx et al., 2001). Increased visibility and accountability counteract social loafing (Xxxxxx, 1995), increase feelings of responsibility for the group task (Van der Vegt et al., 1998) and thus enhance group performance. Therefore the hypothesis with respect to the main effect of cognitive interdependence on performance is formulated as follows: Hypothesis 2: Cognitive interdepe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Cognitive interdependence and performance

  • COMPLIANCE AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Two (2) Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be conducted during each Term of this Agreement. Additional meetings may be scheduled at the discretion of Department to ensure Concessionaire’s effectiveness and compliance. The meetings shall review all aspects of the Concession Operation, ensuring that quality public services are being provided on a continuing basis in accordance with the Bid Specifications and this Agreement, that operational problems/concerns are addressed on a timely basis, and that all terms and conditions are clearly understood. The meetings shall be held on site with Department-designated State Park Service staff representative(s), the on-site concession manager, and a management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm. A report form shall be utilized to document the meeting, and to identify any deficiencies and the corrective action required. A copy of the completed report form shall be provided to the on- site concession manager or the management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm and shall be attached to and made a part of this Agreement. The Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be held as follows: • Meeting #1 - Prior to commencement of the Period of Operation or Memorial Day, whichever comes first. • Meeting #2 - Within ten (10) calendar days after the last approved day of the Period of Operation.

  • EVALUATING PERFORMANCE 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out -

  • Parties to Perform Obligations 16.4.1 Notwithstanding the existence of any Dispute and difference referred to the Appropriate Commission and save as the Appropriate Commission may otherwise direct by a final or interim order, the Parties hereto shall continue to perform their respective obligations (which are not in dispute) under this Agreement.

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE Agencies shall report any vendor failure to perform according to the requirements of this contract on Complaint to Vendor, form PUR 7017. Should the vendor fail to correct the problem within a prescribed period of time, then form PUR 7029, Request for Assistance, is to be filed with this office.

  • Nurses Unit and Per Diem Nurses Unit This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the County of San Bernardino hereinafter referred to as the “County” and the California Nurses Association hereinafter referred to as the “Association” or “CNA”.

  • Work Performance All work in performance of this Lease shall be done by skilled workers or mechanics and shall be acceptable to the RECO. The RECO may reject the Lessor’s workers 1) if such are unlicensed, unskilled, or otherwise incompetent, or 2) if such have demonstrated a history of either untimely or otherwise unacceptable performance in connection with work carried out in conjunction with either this contract or other Government or private contracts.

  • Excused Performance 6.1 Notwithstanding the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, in which case Clause 17 will govern, BT will not be liable for any failure or delay to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement (including any of its obligations to meet any Service Levels) to the extent that BT’s failure or delay in performing arises as a result of:

  • School Performance The School shall achieve an accountability designation of Good Standing or Honor on each of the three sections of the Performance Framework. In the event the School is a party to a third party management contract which includes a deficit protection clause, the School shall be exempt from some or all measures within the financial portion of the Performance Framework. In accordance with Charter School Law, the Authorizer shall renew any charter in which the public charter school met all of the terms of its performance certificate at the time of renewal.

  • Services Performance All services are performed using generally recognized commercial practices and standards. Customer agrees to provide prompt notice of any such service concerns and HP will re-perform any service that fails to meet this standard.

  • Timeliness of Performance Contractor must provide the Services and Deliverables within the term and within the time limits required under this Contract, pursuant to Detailed Specifications or as specified in the applicable Task Order or Purchase Order. Further, Contractor acknowledges that TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE and that the failure of Contractor to comply with the time limits may result in economic or other losses to the City. Neither Contractor nor its agents, employees or Subcontractors are entitled to any damages from the City, nor is any party entitled to be reimbursed by the City, for damages, charges or other losses or expenses incurred by Contractor by reason of delays or hindrances in the performance of the Services, whether or not caused by the City.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.