COMPARATIVE TABLE Sample Clauses

COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1994 Revised Edition of the Retirement Age Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2000 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Retirement Age Act. 2000 Ed. 1994 Ed. 5 4A 7 6 8 7 9 8
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COMPARATIVE TABLE. This table will list the ordinance number and description included in each Supplement and set out the location thereof. This Table will be inserted preceding the Index.
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following table compares the strategies proposed in the current document with those identified in one global (CMS), one hemispheric (WHMSI) and one regional (NABCI) initiative, of relevance to migratory bird conservation in the Americas. Assignment of initiative strategies is only intended to be illustrative of the overlap. CMS WHMSI NABCI
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1995 Revised Edition of the Finance Companies Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2000 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Finance Companies Act. 2000 Ed. 1995 Ed. (3) and (4) (2) 6 — (8) 6A Omitted —Spent 7A — (3) 7A — (3) 7A — (4) 14 — (3) and (4) 14 — (3) (5) (4) 17 — (1) and (2) 17 Omitted —Spent 23 — (3) 23 — (3) 23 — (4) (4) (5) (5) (6) (6) (7)
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1985 Revised Edition of the Industrial Relations Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2004 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Industrial Relations Act. 2004 Ed. 1985 Ed. 18 17 19 18 20 19 21 20 22 21 23 22 24 23 25 24 Deleted 25 16 30 PART IV — LIMITED REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES IN MANAGERIAL AND EXECUTIVE POSITIONS PART IIIA — LIMITED REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES IN MANAGERIAL AND EXECUTIVE POSITIONS 30 30A 30A 30B 30B 30C 30C 30D 30D 30E 30E 30F PART V — ARBITRATION PART IV — ARBITRATION 35—(2) 35—(1A) (3) (2) (4) (3) (5) (4) (6) (5) (7) (5A) (8) (6) (9) (7) (10) (8) (11) (9) PART VI — AWARDS PART V — AWARDS 39—(5) and (6) 39—(5) PART VII — PROCEDURE AND POWERS OF COURTS
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1999 Revised Edition of the Banking Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioner in this 2003 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Banking Act. 2003 Ed. 1999 Ed. 4B-(1) and (2) 4B-(1) (3) to (10) (2) to (9) - 9A-(7) (Spent) 10-(3) 10-(2A) (4) (3) - 14A-(7) (Deleted by Act 23/2001) 14A-(7) (8) - 24(Repealed by Act 23/2001) 25-(3) 25-(2A) (4) (3) - (4), (5), (5A), (6), (7), (7A) and (8) (Deleted by Act 23/2001) (5) (9) - 26-(2) (Omitted, being obsolete by virtue of MAS Notice 610 to Banks issued under section 26 (1)) 26-(2) (2A) (3) and (4) (2B) and (2C) - (3) (Omitted, being obsolete by virtue of MAS Notice 610 to Banks issued under section 26 (1)) (5) to (8) (4) to (7) 44 44-(1) - (2) (Deleted by Act 23/2001) - 46A (Repealed by Act 23/2001) 54-(2) and (3) 54-(2) (4) (3) 55 54A 56 55 - 56 (Repealed by Act 23/2001) - 57 (Repealed by Act 23/2001) - 59A (Repealed by Act 39/2002) 77A-(3) 77A-(2A) (4) to (9) (3) to (8) 78-(3) 78-(2A) (4) and (5) (3) and (4) - First Schedule (Omitted, being obsolete by virtue of MAS Notice 610 to Banks issued under section 26 (1)) - Second Schedule (Omitted, being obsolete by virtue of MAS Notice 610 to Banks issued under section 26 (1)) - Third Schedule (Omitted, being obsolete by virtue of MAS Notice 610 to Banks issued under section 26 (1)) First Schedule Fourth Schedule Second Schedule Fifth Schedule

Related to COMPARATIVE TABLE

  • PERCENTAGE GOAL The goal for Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) participation in the work to be performed under this contract is 23.7 % of the contract amount.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Carry Forward to a Subsequent Year If you do not withdraw the excess contribution, you may carry forward the contribution for a subsequent tax year. To do so, you under-contribute for that tax year and carry the excess contribution amount forward to that year on your tax return. The six percent excess contribution penalty tax will be imposed on the excess amount for each year that it remains as an excess contribution at the end of the year. You must file IRS Form 5329 along with your income tax return to report and remit any additional taxes to the IRS.

  • Accounting Period The Company’s accounting period shall be the calendar year.

  • Budget 1. The Grantee budget for grant activities for the 2023 Summer Program and State fiscal year 2024 is $ 573,172. Any funds received under this grant will not be used to supplant funds normally budgeted for programs or service of the same or similar type.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.