COMPARATIVE TABLE Sample Clauses

COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1994 Revised Edition of the Retirement Age Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2000 Revised Edition.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COMPARATIVE TABLE. This table will list the ordinance number and description included in each Supplement and set out the location thereof. This Table will be inserted preceding the Index.
Sample 1Sample 2
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following table compares the strategies proposed in the current document with those identified in one global (CMS), one hemispheric (WHMSI) and one regional (NABCI) initiative, of relevance to migratory bird conservation in the Americas. Assignment of initiative strategies is only intended to be illustrative of the overlap. CMS WHMSI NABCI
Sample 1
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1985 Revised Edition of the Industrial Relations Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2004 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Industrial Relations Act. 2004 Ed. 1985 Ed. 18 17 19 18 20 19 21 20 22 21 23 22 24 23 25 24 16 30 PART IV — LIMITED REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES IN MANAGERIAL AND EXECUTIVE POSITIONS PART IIIA — LIMITED REPRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEES IN MANAGERIAL AND EXECUTIVE POSITIONS 30 30A 30A 30B 30B 30C 30C 30D 30D 30E 30E 30F PART V — ARBITRATION PART IV — ARBITRATION 35—(2) 35—(1A) (3) (2) (4) (3) (5) (4) (6) (5) (7) (5A) (8) (6) (9) (7) (10) (8) (11) (9) PART VI — AWARDS PART V — AWARDS 39—(5) and (6) 39—(5) PART VII — PROCEDURE AND POWERS OF COURTS
Sample 1
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1999 Revised Edition of the Banking Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioner in this 2003 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Banking Act.
Sample 1
COMPARATIVE TABLE. The following provisions in the 1995 Revised Edition of the Finance Companies Act have been renumbered by the Law Revision Commissioners in this 2000 Revised Edition. This Comparative Table is provided for the convenience of users. It is not part of the Finance Companies Act. 2000 Ed. 1995 Ed. (3) and (4) (2) 6 — (8) 6A Omitted —Spent 7A — (3) 7A — (3) 7A — (4) 14 — (3) and (4) 14 — (3) (5) (4) 17 — (1) and (2) 17 Omitted —Spent 23 — (3) 23 — (3) 23 — (4) (4) (5) (5) (6) (6) (7)
Sample 1

Related to COMPARATIVE TABLE

  • REFERENCE TABLE Trust Indenture Act of 1939 Indenture Section Section ------- ------- 310(a).........................................................................................................6.11 310(b).........................................................................................................6.11 310(c).........................................................................................................N.A. 311(a).........................................................................................................6.12 311(b).........................................................................................................6.12 311(c).........................................................................................................N.A. 312(a)...................................................................................................7.01, 7.02 312(b).........................................................................................................7.02 312(c).........................................................................................................7.02 313(a).........................................................................................................7.04 313(b).........................................................................................................7.04 313(c).........................................................................................................7.04 314(a).........................................................................................................7.03 314(b)...................................................................................................3.05, 7.03 314(c)........................................................................................................11.01 314(d)........................................................................................................11.01 314(e)........................................................................................................11.01 314(f).........................................................................................................N.A. 315(a).........................................................................................................6.01 315(b).........................................................................................................6.05 315(c).........................................................................................................6.01 315(d).........................................................................................................6.01 315(e).........................................................................................................5.14 316(a)...................................................................................................2.07, 5.04 316(b).........................................................................................................9.02 316(c).........................................................................................................N.A. 317(a).........................................................................................................5.03 317(b).........................................................................................................3.03 318(a)........................................................................................................

  • CROSS-REFERENCE TABLE TIA Section Indenture Section

  • Historical Performance Information To the extent agreed upon by the parties, the Sub-Advisor will provide the Trust with historical performance information on similarly managed investment companies or for other accounts to be included in the Prospectus or for any other uses permitted by applicable law.

  • Adjusted EBITDA The 2019 adjusted EBITDA for the Affiliated Club Sellers shall total an aggregate of not less than $10,700,000.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Minimum Consolidated EBITDA The Borrower will not permit Modified Consolidated EBITDA, for any Test Period ending at the end of any fiscal quarter of the Borrower set forth below, to be less than the amount set forth opposite such fiscal quarter: Fiscal Quarter Amount September 30, 1997 $36,000,000 December 31, 1997 $36,000,000 March 31, 1998 $36,000,000 June 30, 1998 $37,000,000 September 30, 1998 $37,000,000 December 31, 1998 $38,000,000 March 31, 1999 $38,000,000 June 30, 1999 $39,000,000 September 30, 1999 $40,000,000 December 31, 1999 $41,000,000 March 31, 2000 $41,000,000 June 30, 2000 $42,000,000 September 30, 2000 $43,000,000 December 31, 2000 $44,000,000 March 31, 2001 $44,000,000 June 30, 2001 $45,000,000 September 30, 2001 $46,000,000 December 31, 2001 $47,000,000 March 31, 2002 $47,000,000

  • Accounting Period The Company’s accounting period shall be the calendar year.

  • Measurement Period In this Agreement, unless the contrary intention appears, a reference to:

  • Budget Consulting Engineer/Architect shall advise City if, in its opinion, the amount budgeted for construction is not sufficient to adequately design and construct the improvement as requested.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!