CONCURRENT REQUESTS. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person either for the same offence or for different offences, the Requested Party shall determine to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify those States of its decision.
2. In determining to which State a person is to be extradited, the Requested Party shall consider all relevant factors, including but not limited to:
(a) the nationality and the ordinary place of residence of the person sought;
(b) whether the requests were made pursuant to treaty;
(c) the time and place where each offence was committed;
(d) the respective interests of the Requesting States;
(e) the gravity of the offences;
(f) the nationality of the victim;
(g) the possibility of further extradition between the Requesting States; and
(h) the respective dates of the requests.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person either for the same offence or for different offences, the Requested Party shall determine, at its own discretion, to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify those States of its decision.
2. In determining to which State a person is to be extradited, the Requested Party shall consider all relevant factors, including but not limited to:
(a) whether the requests were made pursuant to treaty;
(b) the nationality and the ordinary place of residence of the person sought;
(c) the time and place where each offence was committed;
(d) the gravity of the offences;
(e) the respective dates of requests.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. Paragraphs 1 and 2 are substantially the same as Article 9(2) of the model text.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. Where the Requested Party receives requests from two or more States for the extradition of the same fugitive/requested person, the Requested Party shall determine, at its discretion, to which State the fugitive/requested person is to be extradited [and, in doing so, shall give priority to requests from States with whom it has a treaty, agreement or arrangement for the surrender of fugitives/requested persons]21. In making a determination under paragraph (1) of this Article, the Requested Party shall/may consider all the circumstances of the case, including but not limited to: the relative seriousness or gravity of the offences; the time and place of the commission of the offences; the relative dates on which the requests were made; and the citizenship or other national status and ordinary residence of the fugitive/requested person sought.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. (1) If extradition is requested by more than one State, either for the same offense or different offenses, the Requested Party shall freely decide on these requests, taking into consideration all the circumstances and especially the nationality of the person sought, the place where the offense or offenses were committed, [*17] the seriousness of the offense or offenses and the respective dates of the requests for extradition.
(2) The Requested Party, while granting extradition in such a case, may authorize the Requesting Party to surrender subsequently the person sought to a third State which also requested extradition.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. If one of the Parties receives requests from the other Party and from any other State or States for the extradition of the same person, either for the same offense or for different offenses, the competent authority of the Requested State shall determine to which State it will surrender the person. In making its decision, the Requested State shall consider all relevant factors, including but not limited to:
(a) whether or not the requests [24] were made pursuant to treaty;
(b) the place where each offense was committed;
(c) the gravity of the offenses;
(d) the respective interests of the Requesting States;
(e) the possibility of further extradition between the Requesting States; and
(f) the chronological order in which the requests were received from the Requesting States.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. If the surrender of a fugitive offender is requested concurrently by one of the Parties and a State or States with whom the Republic of India or Hong Kong, whichever is being requested, has arrangements for the surrender of fugitive offenders, the requested Party shall make its decision in so far as its law allows having regard to all the circumstances including the provisions in this regard in any Agreements in force between the requested Party and the requesting Parties, the relative seriousness and place of commission of the offences, the respective dates of the requests, the nationality of the person sought and the possibility of subsequent surrender to another State, and notify the other Party of its decision in the event of surrender of the fugitive to another jurisdiction.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. If the surrender of a person is requested concurrently by one of the Parties and a state with whom the Government of Hong Kong or the Republic of the Philippines, whichever is being requested, has agreements or arrangements for the surrender of accused and convicted persons, the requested Party shall make its decision having regard to all the circumstances including provisions in this regard in any arrangements in force between the requested Party and the requesting Parties, the relative seriousness and place of commission of the offences, the respective dates of the requests, the nationality and ordinary place of residence of the person sought and the possibility of subsequent surrender to another state. In such a case, it shall furnish the other Party with information justifying its decision in the event of surrender of the person to another jurisdiction.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. (1) If the surrender of a person is requested concurrently by one of the Parties and a State with whom the Republic of Indonesia or Hong Kong, whichever is being requested, has Agreements or arrangements for the surrender of fugitive offenders the Requested Party shall determine to which of those jurisdictions the person is to be surrendered and shall notify the Requesting Party of its decision together with information justifying its decision in the event of surrender of the person to another jurisdiction.
(2) In determining to which jurisdiction a person is to be surrendered, the Requested Party shall have regard to all the circumstances and, in particular, to:
(a) if the requests relate to different offences, the relative seriousness of the offences;
(b) the time and place of commission of each offence;
(c) the respective dates of the requests;
(d) the nationality of the person;
(e) the ordinary place of residence of the person; and
(f) the possibility of subsequent surrender to another jurisdiction.
CONCURRENT REQUESTS. (1) Where the Requested Party receives requests from two or more States for the extradition of the same fugitive/requested person, the Requested Party shall determine, at its discretion, to which State the fugitive/requested person is to be extradited [and, in 20 The Parties may insert the second sentence in negotiating their extradition treaty. doing so, shall give priority to requests from States with whom it has a treaty, agreement or arrangement for the surrender of fugitives/requested persons]21.
(2) In making a determination under paragraph (1) of this Article, the Requested Party shall/may consider all the circumstances of the case, including but not limited to:
(a) the relative seriousness or gravity of the offences;
(b) the time and place of the commission of the offences;
(c) the relative dates on which the requests were made; and
(d) the citizenship or other national status and ordinary residence of the fugitive/requested person sought.
