Examples of Requesting Parties in a sentence
If both the Owner Trustee (on behalf of one or more Certificateholders) and the Indenture Trustee (on behalf of one or more Noteholders or Note Owners) are Requesting Parties, then the Indenture Trustee as Requesting Party shall have the right to make the selection of mediation (including nonbinding arbitration) or arbitration.
If both the Owner Trustee (on behalf of one or more Certificateholders) and the Indenture Trustee (on behalf of one or more Noteholders or Note Owners) are Requesting Parties, then the Indenture Trustee as Requesting Party shall have the right to make the selection of mediation or arbitration.
If both the Owner Trustee (on behalf of one or more Certificateholders) and the Indenture Trustee (on behalf of one or more Investors) are Requesting Parties, then the Indenture Trustee as Requesting Party (at the direction of the Investor that directed the Indenture Trustee to make the repurchase request) shall have the right to make the selection of mediation or arbitration.
Depending on the amount of duty, the impact on United States exports could exceed by many multiples any impact that the CDSOA may have on exports from the Requesting Parties.
The United States contends that the Requesting Parties set no limits on the amount of trade that would be covered by their request.
In such a case, the Disclosing Party will notify all Requesting Parties that the Disclosing Party has agreed to withdraw its designation of Protected Materials for specific documents or material.
The United States adds that the Requesting Parties decline to provide any information on the level of suspension requested or to base their request on trade effect.19 2.15 The United States notes that the Requesting Parties intend to impose a yet unidentified duty to an unspecified value of imports, thus failing to identify the amount of trade that would be covered by their request.
The United States presents this issue as one of specificity of the request under Article 22.2 of the DSU and, more generally as a question of duty to cooperate with the Arbitrator by providing information on the level of nullification or impairment.18 2.14 The United States contends that the Requesting Parties have failed to quantify either the level of suspension or the level of nullification or impairment.
Since a central question in this case is whether the Requesting Parties are entitled, under Article 22 of the DSU, to proceed on the basis of the level of nullification or impairment and the level of suspension they propose, it does not seem appropriate in our opinion to address this question as a matter for a preliminary ruling.
The Requesting Parties replace specific values with general concepts and ask the Arbitrator to determine that two amounts are equivalent to one another without knowing what those amounts are.