Conduct of the Hearings Sample Clauses

Conduct of the Hearings. The Player and the NHLPA, jointly, and the Club and the League, jointly, shall each have a maximum of ninety (90) minutes to present its case and may allocate such ninety
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conduct of the Hearings. The Player and the NHLPA, jointly, and the Club and the League, jointly, shall each have a maximum of ninety (90) minutes to present its case and may allocate such ninety (90) minutes between its direct case and its rebuttal case in any manner it so chooses in its sole discretion. If the party presenting second has raised new substantive issues or introduced additional comparable Players for the first time during its rebuttal case, then the party presenting first shall, upon the request of the NHLPA or the League only (whichever is the applicable party), have ten (10) minutes for surrebuttal, which may be used solely to address those new issues or new comparable Players and may not be used for additional closing arguments.

Related to Conduct of the Hearings

  • Conduct of the Hearing The arbitrator shall hold the hearing in Portland, Oregon unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The hearing shall commence within sixty (60) working days of the arbitrator's acceptance of the case, unless both parties agree to an extension of time. If the arbitrator or either party requests that post-hearing briefs be submitted, the arbitrator shall establish a date for the submission of such briefs and the hearing will be deemed to have been closed by such date.

  • Conduct of Hearings Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures contained in Government Code Section 11513. Hearing sessions shall be private with attendance limited to the panel, the parties’ representatives and witnesses as scheduled. In cases involving below-standard evaluations or disciplinary action, the District shall proceed first in providing evidence.

  • Conduct of Hearing a. The formal rules of evidence do not apply, although the presiding officer will have discretion to exclude evidence that is incompetent, irrelevant, or cumulative, or the presentation of which will otherwise consume undue time.

  • Conduct of the Arbitration 1. Where issues relating to jurisdiction or admissibility are raised as preliminary objections, the tribunal shall decide the matter before proceeding to the merits.

  • Conduct of the Parties The parties will not engage in behaviour that is, or may reasonably be considered to be intimidating, bullying, or harassing or commit any act or behaviour which is offensive or abusive in connection with this Agreement.

  • Conduct of the Business Each of the Company and Parent covenants and agrees that:

  • Conduct of mediation In consultation with the mediator, the parties will determine a location, timetable and procedure for the mediation or, if the parties cannot agree on these matters within 7 Working Days of the appointment of the mediator these matters will be determined by the mediator.

  • Conduct of Mediation Sessions Mediation hearings will be conducted in an informal manner and discovery will not be allowed. The discussions, statements, writings and admissions will be confidential to the proceedings (pursuant to California Evidence Code sections 1115 through 1128) and will not be used for any other purpose unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. The parties may agree to exchange any information they deem necessary. Both parties shall have a representative attend the mediation who is authorized to settle the dispute, though City's recommendation of settlement may be subject to the approval of the Mayor and City Council. Either party may have attorneys, witnesses or experts present.

  • Conduct of Arbitration a) The seat of the arbitration shall be at New Delhi, India.

  • Conduct of the Study The Parties shall perform the Study set forth in Protocol No. [ ] dated [ ] (“Protocol”) in accordance with this Agreement, the Protocol and all applicable laws and regulations. The Institution shall follow all guidelines and instructions reasonably provided by Sponsor. [If applicable:] The Principal Investigator has, in addition to his/her Principal Investigator responsibilities, been appointed to coordinate certain activities at a national level as National Coordinating Investigator. It is the duty of the National Coordinating Investigator to obtain all approvals for the Study required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements from the relevant Independent Ethics Committee (“IEC”) before commencing the Study. The National Coordinating Investigator shall also, to the extent required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements, notify and obtain the consent of the relevant EC of any amendments to the Protocol. Such approvals shall be forwarded to Sponsor as they are obtained.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.