Contested Case Proceedings Sample Clauses

Contested Case Proceedings. The contested case process provided in Tex. Gov’t Code Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, will be the MA Dual SNP’s sole and exclusive process for seeking a remedy for any and all alleged breaches of contract by HHSC if the parties are unable to resolve their disputes under Section 8.03(b). The parties expressly agree that compliance with the contested case process provided in Tex. Gov’t Code Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, will be a condition precedent to seeking consent to sue HHSC from the Texas Legislature under Chapter 107, Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. Neither the execution of this Agreement by HHSC nor any other conduct of any representative of HHSC relating to this Agreement will be considered a waiver of HHSC’s sovereign immunity to suit.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contested Case Proceedings. 2260, Subchapter C, will be the MA D seeking a remedy for any and all alleged breaches of contract by HHSC if the Parties are unable to resolve their disputes under Section 7.03(b). The Parties expressly agree that compliance with the contested case pr Code Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, will be a condition precedent to seeking consent to sue HHSC from the Texas Legislature under Chapter 107, Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. Neither the execution of this Agreement by HHSC nor any other conduct of any representative of HHSC relating to this Agreement
Contested Case Proceedings. The contested case process provided in Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, Government Code, will be CONTRACTOR’s sole and exclusive process for seeking a remedy for any and all alleged breaches of contract by HHSC if the Parties are unable to resolve their disputes under Subsection (c)(2) of this Section.
Contested Case Proceedings. The contested case process provided in Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, Texas Government Code, will be Vendor’s sole and ex- clusive process for seeking a remedy for any and all alleged breaches of the CTSA by DIR if the Parties are unable to resolve their disputes under Subsec- tion (c)(2) of this Section. The Parties expressly agree that compliance with the contested case process provided in Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, Texas Gov- ernment Code, is a condition precedent to seeking consent to xxx from the Texas Legislature under Chapter 107, Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code. Neither the execution of this CTSA by DIR nor any other conduct of any repre- sentative of DIR relating to this CTSA shall be construed as or be considered a waiver of the State’s sovereign immunity.
Contested Case Proceedings. The contested case process provided in Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, Texas Government Code, will be Vendor’s sole and ex-
Contested Case Proceedings. The Parties expressly agree that the contested case process provided in Chapter 2260, Subchapter C, Texas Government Code, will be Manufacturer/Labeler's sole and exclusive process for seeking a remedy for any and all alleged breaches of contract by HHSC if the Parties are unable to resolve their disputes under Section 7.02(c).
Contested Case Proceedings. The Parties agree to execute this Agreement in lieu of chapter 91, HRS, contested case proceedings for the Enforcement Actions. Xxx’s request for a contested case hearing at the April 26, 2024, Board meeting and in a letter dated May 2, 2024, is deemed withdrawn. In the event that this Agreement is not effectuated, the contested case proceedings shall proceed as if this Agreement had not been made. In such an event, this Agreement shall not be presented as evidence by either party or considered by any tribunal in any current or future administrative or legal proceeding relating to this matter.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Contested Case Proceedings

  • Condemnation Proceedings 15.5.1. District covenants and agrees, but only to the extent that it may lawfully do so, that so long as this Site Lease remains in effect, the District will not seek to exercise the power of eminent domain with respect to the Project so as to cause a full or partial termination of this Site Lease and the Facilities Lease.

  • Litigation; Proceedings Except as specifically disclosed in the Disclosure Materials, there is no action, suit, notice of violation, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the best knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties before or by any court, governmental or administrative agency or regulatory authority (federal, state, county, local or foreign) which (i) adversely affects or challenges the legality, validity or enforceability of any Transaction Document or the Securities or (ii) could, individually or in the aggregate, have or result in a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Court Proceedings KML will provide Pembina and its legal counsel with reasonable opportunity to review and comment upon drafts of all material to be filed with the Court in connection with the Arrangement, including by providing on a timely basis a description of any information required to be supplied by Pembina for inclusion in such material, prior to the service and filing of that material, and will accept the reasonable comments of Pembina and its legal counsel with respect to any such information required to be supplied by Pembina and included in such material and any other matters contained therein. KML will ensure that all material filed with the Court in connection with the Arrangement is consistent in all material respects with the terms of this Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement. In addition, KML will not object to legal counsel to Pembina making submissions on the application for the Interim Order and the application for the Final Order as such counsel considers appropriate, provided such submissions are consistent with this Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement. KML will also provide legal counsel to Pembina on a timely basis with copies of any notice and evidence served on KML or its legal counsel in respect of the application for the Interim Order or Final Order or any appeal therefrom. Subject to applicable Laws, KML will not file any material with, or make any submissions to, the Court in connection with the Arrangement or serve any such material, and will not agree to modify or amend materials so filed or served, except as contemplated hereby or with Pembina’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; provided that nothing herein shall require Pembina to agree or consent to any increased purchase price or other consideration or other modification or amendment to such filed or served materials that expands or increases Pembina’s obligations set forth in any such filed or served materials or under this Agreement. KML shall oppose any proposal from any Person that would result in the Interim Order or Final Order containing any provision that is inconsistent with this Agreement. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Pembina shall use commercially reasonable efforts cooperate with and assist KML in seeking the Interim Order and the Final Order, including by providing to KML, on a timely basis, any information reasonably required to be supplied by Pembina in connection therewith.

  • Adverse Proceedings No action or proceeding by or before any court or other governmental body shall have been instituted or threatened by any governmental body or person whatsoever which shall seek to restrain, prohibit or invalidate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Actions; Proceedings There are no actions, suits or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of the Assignor, threatened, before or by any court, administrative agency, arbitrator or governmental body (A) with respect to any of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement or (B) with respect to any other matter that in the judgment of the Assignor will be determined adversely to the Assignor and will, if determined adversely to the Assignor, materially adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under this Assignment Agreement.

  • Adverse Proceedings, etc There are no Adverse Proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, that could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. Neither Holdings nor any of its Subsidiaries (a) is in violation of any applicable laws (including Environmental Laws) that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, or (b) is subject to or in default with respect to any final judgments, writs, injunctions, decrees, rules or regulations of any court or any federal, state, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!