Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s Flowgate, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch. Southwest Power Pool - Rate Schedules and Seams Agreements Tariff - MISO-SPP Joint Operating Agreement - Rate Schedule 9 Article VI - Rate Schedule 9 Section 6.3
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. During Phase 2 and Phase 3. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, during Phase 2, Market to Non-Market, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s flowgate, or during Xxxxx 0, Xxxxxx to Market, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch to the extent the costs may be recovered under the Party’s OATT.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s Flowgate, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. Each Party and Reciprocal Entity shall bear its own costs, if any, of compliance with the Congestion Management Process and this Article.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. During Phase 2 and Phase 3. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, during Phase 2, Market to Non-Market, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s flowgate, or during Xxxxx 0, Xxxxxx to Market, as set forth in Article XII, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch to the extent the costs may be recovered under the Party’s OATT. Stakeholder comment: Seems to indicate that if MISO has to redispatch for a SPP flow that SPP has to pay the cost of the redispatch “to the extent the costs may be recovered under the SPP tariff. The reverse is also true… We are not sure what the status of the Tariffs of both regions is or will be on this issue, but it seems they should be in sync. If SPP can recover the cost under its tariff AND therefore has to pay the expense. MISO should have to revise its tariff so that they are on equal footing. MWG, ORWG, RTWG response: Parties need to clarify their intent with cleaner language. SPP’s original intent was that each party would bear their own costs of redispatch when responding to the other party’s congestion. General consensus is that, for Phase 2, this is appropriate.
Costs Arising From Reciprocal Coordination of Flowgates. During Phase 1 and Phase 2. In the event redispatch occurs in order to coordinate congestion management under Section 6.1 or subparts thereof, during Phase 1, Market to Non-Market, including redispatch necessary to respect the other Party’s Flowgate, or during Phase 2, Market to Market, as set forth in Article XI, the Party responsible for the flow that required the redispatch shall bear the costs of the redispatch, except that if that Party is unable to recover the costs of redispatch under its OATT or under some other agreement, then redispatch need not be provided under this Section 6.2. Prior to Phase 2, each Party will seek any necessary amendments to its OATT or governing documents in order to recover such costs during Phase 2.
