Common use of Cumulative Effects Assessment Clause in Contracts

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (1999) and in the Agency’s Operation Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act” updated in November 2007. The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:  water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;  air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;  asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights and interests;  wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and  valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:  a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and  future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (1999) and in the Agency’s Operation Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012” updated in November 2007May 2013. The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:  water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;  air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;  asserted or established Aboriginal and or treaty rights and interests;  wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and  valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:   a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and   future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (1999) and in the Agency’s Operation Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012” updated in November 2007May 2013. The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:  • water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;  • air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;  • asserted or established Aboriginal and or treaty rights and interests;  • wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and  • valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:  • a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and  • future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (1999) and in the Agency’s Operation Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act” updated in November 2007. The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:   water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;   air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;   asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights and interests;   wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and   valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:  a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and  future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s draft “Technical Guidance for Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide under CEAA 2012” (1999December 2014) and in the Agency’s Operation Operational Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Assessing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment ActCEAA 2012” updated in November 2007. The (December 2014).The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:  • water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;  • air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;  • asserted or established Aboriginal and or treaty rights and interests;  • wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and  • valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the spatial and temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:  • a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and  • future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.

Cumulative Effects Assessment. The cumulative effects assessment should take into consideration the approach described in the Agency’s Cumulative Effects Assessment Practitioners Guide (1999) and in the Agency’s Operation Policy Statement entitled “Addressing Cumulative Environmental Effects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act” updated in November 2007. The Joint Review Panel should focus its consideration of cumulative effects on key valued components. Without limiting itself thereto, the following components should be considered:  ▪ water quality and quantity, including any potential effects on navigable waters or navigation;  ▪ air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;  ▪ asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights and interests;  ▪ wildlife and wildlife habitat for valued species including: federally and provincially listed species at risk, and migratory birds; and  ▪ valued vegetation communities and wetlands. The cumulative effects assessment should provide a justification and description of the temporal boundaries and include, but not be limited to, the following:  ▪ a pre-industrial case to allow the Joint Review Panel to take into account the effects that may have already been experienced prior to the project; and  ▪ future foreseeable projects or activities as of the issuance of the Joint Review Panel’s Terms of Reference.