DEFERRED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL ECONOMIC HARDSHIP Sample Clauses

DEFERRED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL ECONOMIC HARDSHIP. In cases of temporary residential consumer economic hardship, the Cooperative may allow a deferred payment arrangement for payment of the deposit or for payment of a delinquent bill.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DEFERRED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL ECONOMIC HARDSHIP. In cases of temporary residential consumer economic hardship, the Cooperative may allow a deferred payment arrangement for payment of the deposit or for payment of a delinquent bill. (a) If a residential consumer demonstrates that economic hardship prevents payment in full of a delinquent bill that is not already covered by a deferred payment plan, the Cooperative may restore or continue service to the consumer if the consumer agrees to a deferred payment plan, signed by both the Cooperative and consumer. The deferred payment plan (1) The consumer agrees to pay one-third (or less at the Cooperative’s option) of the outstanding bill at the time the deferred payment agreement is signed; (2) The consumer agrees to pay all future bills for Cooperative service in accordance with the provisions of this section; and (3) The consumer agrees to pay the remaining outstanding balance in installments over a period not to exceed twelve (12) months. (b) The Cooperative will not require any deferred payment agreement to have a duration of less than three (3) months. (c) In determining a reasonable deferred payment plan schedule, the Cooperative will discuss with the consumer and consider the following conditions: (1) size of the delinquent account; (2) consumer's ability to pay; (3) consumer's payment history; (4) length of time the debt has been outstanding; (5) circumstances that resulted in the outstanding debt; and (6) any other relevant factors related to the circumstances of the consumer.

Related to DEFERRED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL ECONOMIC HARDSHIP

  • Safe Harbor The recipient government will then compare the reporting year’s actual tax revenue to the baseline. If actual tax revenue is greater than the baseline, Treasury will deem the recipient government not to have any recognized net reduction for the reporting year, and therefore to be in a safe harbor and outside the ambit of the offset provision. This approach is consistent with the ARPA, which contemplates recoupment of Fiscal Recovery Funds only in the event that such funds are used to offset a reduction in net tax revenue. If net tax revenue has not been reduced, this provision does not apply. In the event that actual tax revenue is above the baseline, the organic revenue growth that has occurred, plus any other revenue-raising changes, by definition must have been enough to offset the in-year costs of the covered changes.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!