Common use of Dist Clause in Contracts

Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527, 128 S. Ct. 2733 (2008) and further refined by NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 558 U.S. 165 (2010) (the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.

Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527, 128 S. Ct. 2733 527 (2008) and further refined by in NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 558 U.S. 165 (2010) (( the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.

Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, Snohomish 554 U.S. 527, 128 S. Ct. 2733 527 (2008) and further refined by in NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 558 U.S. 165 (2010) (( the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.

Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish, 554 U.S. 527, 128 S. Ct. 2733 (2008) and further refined by inby NRG Power Marketing v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 558 U.S. 165 (2010) (( the “Mobile-Sierra” doctrine). The Parties acknowledge that this agreement constitutes a contract rate, and all future proposed changes or challenges will be reviewed pursuant to the public interest application of the just and reasonable standard of review.