District Court of Satakunta Sample Clauses

District Court of Satakunta. The District Court of Satakunta as the court of first instance emphasized the fact that C was not a party to the shareholders’ agreement and had not signed the agreement. The District Court interpreted section 3 of the Finnish Arbitration Act narrowly and underlined the 54 Section 4 of the Finnish Arbitration Act (translation, see Xxxxxxxx 1984, Annex I of the Finland Chapter, p. 1). letter of the law, requiring that an express written consent be made by C in order for him to be bound by the arbitration clause. In addition, the District Court supported this sentiment by noting that the contracting parties would have had the possibility to bind C by including a provision expressly stating so. In conclusion, the District Court found that C was not bound by the arbitration clause.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to District Court of Satakunta

  • District The public agency or the school district for which the Work is performed. The governing board of the District or its designees will act for the District in all matters pertaining to the Contract. The District may, at any time:

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

  • Courts The parties agree that the State and Federal courts in The City of New York shall have jurisdiction for purposes of enforcement of their agreement to submit Disputes to arbitration and of any award of the Arbitrator.

  • Court of Jurisdiction Both DBS and the Member agree that the Tokyo District Court will be the exclusive court of jurisdiction in the first instance in any dispute and/ or legal action relating to the rights and obligations under this Agreement or an Individual Contract. Attachment 1 Contact Information

  • Legal venue The terms and conditions of this Contract shall be construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. If any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of this Contract, the parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue for bringing such action shall be in the appropriate court in Xxxxxxxxx County, Colorado. The prevailing party in any action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall collect all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in such action, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

  • Agreement Made in California; Venue The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for all litigation relative to the formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be in San Francisco.

  • The City of Milwaukee, by its Milwaukee Board of School Directors, shall pay the Contractor for the full and complete performance of the work, the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00/100 ($365,500.00) as provided in the General Conditions of the Contract.

  • Law, Venue 19.1. This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, enforceability and interpretation of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California.

  • MAGISTRATE’S COURT JURISDICTION The Parties hereto consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrates' Court in terms of Section 45 read with Section 28 of the Magistrates’ Court Act of 1944 as amended. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, this shall not preclude either Party from approaching the High Court of South Africa for any relief sought. This Agreement shall further be governed in terms of the law of the Republic of South Africa.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!