Emergency Disruption by City Sample Clauses

Emergency Disruption by City. The City may remove, alter, tear out, relocate or damage portions of the Facilities in the case of fire, disaster, or other emergencies if the City Manager or designee deems such action to be reasonably necessary under the circumstances. In such event, the City and its agents, contractors or employees shall not be liable to WANRack or its customers or third parties for any harm so caused to them or the Facilities. When practical, the City shall consult with WANRack in advance to assess the necessity of such actions and to minimize to the extent practical under the circumstances damage to and disruption of operation of the Facilities. In any event, the City shall inform WANRack after such actions. WANRack’s work to repair or restore the Facilities shall be Relocation Work as set forth in Section 11 below.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Emergency Disruption by City

  • Postal Disruption Despite section A17.2(a), in the event of a postal disruption: (a) Notice by postage-prepaid mail will not be deemed to be given; and (b) the Party giving Notice will give Notice by email, personal delivery, or fax.

  • Emergency Escalation Escalation is strictly for purposes of notifying and investigating possible or potential issues in relation to monitored services. The initiation of any escalation and the subsequent cooperative investigations do not in themselves imply that a monitored service has failed its performance requirements. Escalations shall be carried out between ICANN and Registry Operators, Registrars and Registry Operator, and Registrars and ICANN. Registry Operators and ICANN must provide said emergency operations departments. Current contacts must be maintained between ICANN and Registry Operators and published to Registrars, where relevant to their role in escalations, prior to any processing of an Emergency Escalation by all related parties, and kept current at all times.

  • Termination by CAISO Subject to Section 5.2, the CAISO may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination in the event that the Participating Load commits any material default under this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff which, if capable of being remedied, is not remedied within thirty (30) days after the CAISO has given, to the Participating Load, written notice of the default, unless excused by reason of Uncontrollable Forces in accordance with Article X of this Agreement. With respect to any notice of termination given pursuant to this Section, the CAISO must file a timely notice of termination with FERC, if this Agreement was filed with FERC, or must otherwise comply with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders. The filing of the notice of termination by the CAISO with FERC will be considered timely if: (1) the filing of the notice of termination is made after the preconditions for termination have been met, and the CAISO files the notice of termination within sixty (60) days after issuance of the notice of default; or (2) the CAISO files the notice of termination in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001. This Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance by FERC of such a notice of termination, if filed with FERC, or thirty (30) days after the date of the CAISO’s notice of default, if terminated in accordance with the requirements of FERC Order No. 2001 and related FERC orders.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!