Common use of Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders Clause in Contracts

Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22 2.24.2 The tender evaluation committee shall evaluate the tender within 30 days of the validity period from the date of opening the tender. 2.24.3 Tenders are invited for individual lots, the contract will be awarded to the tenderer offering a substantially responsive Tender(s) and the lowest evaluated cost for individual lots, subject to the selected tenderer(s) meeting the required qualification criteria for each lot. In determining tenderer that offer the lowest evaluated cost to the Procuring Entity for each lot, the Procuring Entity shall apply the following steps in sequence: a. evaluate individual lots to determine the substantially responsive Tenders and corresponding evaluated costs; b. for each lot, rank the substantially responsive Tenders starting from the lowest evaluated cost for the lot; c. apply to the evaluated costs listed in (b) above, any applicable discounts/price reductions offered by a tenderer (s) for the award of each Lot based on the discounts and the methodology for their application offered by the respective Tenderer; and d. determine contract award based on the lots that offer the tender offers each of which has the lowest evaluated cost to the Procuring Entity. 2.24.4 A tenderer who gives false information in the tender document about its qualification or who refuses to enter into a contract after notification of contract award shall be considered for debarment from participating in future public procurement.

Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22 2.24.2 The tender evaluation committee shall evaluate the tender within 30 days of the validity period from the date of opening the tender. 2.24.3 Tenders are invited for individual lots, the contract will be awarded to the tenderer offering a substantially responsive Tender(s) and the lowest evaluated cost for individual lots, subject to the selected tenderer(s) meeting the required qualification criteria for each lot. In determining tenderer that offer the lowest evaluated cost to the Procuring Entity for each lot, the Procuring Entity shall apply the following steps in sequence: a. evaluate individual lots to determine the substantially responsive Tenders and corresponding evaluated costs; b. for each lot, rank the substantially responsive Tenders starting from the lowest evaluated cost for the lot; c. apply to the evaluated costs listed in (b) above, any applicable discounts/price reductions offered by a tenderer (s) for the award of each Lot based on the discounts and the methodology for their application offered by the respective Tenderer; and d. determine contract award based on the lots that offer the tender offers each of which has the lowest evaluated cost to the Procuring Entity. 2.24.4 A tenderer who gives false information in the tender document about its qualification or who refuses to enter into a contract after notification of contract award shall be considered for debarment from participating in future public procurement.. The method of evaluation will be Merit Point System The criteria of evaluation and the points to be awarded on each criterion will be as follows: