Failure to Delivery Adequate Lake Water Supply Sample Clauses

Failure to Delivery Adequate Lake Water Supply. The Lake Water Supply Agreement shall provide for MGE’s right to seek specific performance for the University’s breach of the Lake Water Supply Agreement on terms consistent with the terms of this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Failure to Delivery Adequate Lake Water Supply

  • Delivery Pressure Seller shall be required to deliver or cause delivery of the Gas to the Point of Delivery and for delivering such Gas at a pressure sufficient to effect such delivery. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Seller shall have the right but not the obligation to install compression to effect deliveries of Gas hereunder.

  • Delivery Points The measurement of and tests for quality of Shipper's Gas redelivered at the Delivery Points shall be governed by and determined in accordance with the requirements of the receiving pipeline at each Delivery Point.

  • SERVICE XXXX USE A. Controlled Affiliate recognizes the importance of a comprehensive national network of independent BCBSA licensees which are committed to strengthening the Licensed Marks and Name. The Controlled Affiliate further recognizes that its actions within its Service Area may affect the value of the Licensed Marks and Name nationwide.

  • Delivery Point Once Manufacture of the Products has been completed, Contractor shall be responsible for delivering the Finished Goods FCA, (as defined in Incoterms (2000) published by the International Chamber of Commerce) and to a freight forwarder specified by Company in its Order, or otherwise approved by Company. “Delivery Point” as used in this Agreement shall mean the specific time and location that the Product is delivered to the shipper specified on the Order.

  • MONITORING FOR MATERIAL IRRECONCILABLE CONFLICTS AVIF agrees that its Board of Directors will monitor for the existence of any material irreconcilable conflict between the interests of the Participants in all separate accounts of life insurance companies utilizing AVIF ("Participating Insurance Companies"), including each Account, and participants in all qualified retirement and pension plans investing in AVIF ("Participating Plans"). LIFE COMPANY agrees to inform the Board of Directors of AVIF of the existence of or any potential for any such material irreconcilable conflict of which it is aware. The concept of a "material irreconcilable conflict" is not defined by the 1940 Act or the rules thereunder, but the Parties recognize that such a conflict may arise for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation:

  • Delivery Location The Aircraft shall be located at the agreed Delivery Location;

  • Disruption to Payment Systems etc If either the Agent determines (in its discretion) that a Disruption Event has occurred or the Agent is notified by the Borrower that a Disruption Event has occurred:

  • DELIVERY OUT The Custodian shall release and deliver out domestic securities and other financial assets of a Portfolio held in a U.S. Securities System, or in an account at the Underlying Transfer Agent, only upon receipt of Proper Instructions on behalf of the applicable Portfolio, specifying the domestic securities or financial assets held in the United States to be delivered out and the person or persons to whom delivery is to be made. The Custodian shall pay out cash of a Portfolio upon receipt of Proper Instructions on behalf of the applicable Portfolio, specifying the amount of the payment and the person or persons to whom the payment is to be made.

  • Non-Conforming Product If Reliant notifies Cardinal Health during the Review Period that the Manufacturing Sample does not conform to the warranty set forth in Section 13.1 and Cardinal Health agrees with Client’s determination, Client shall not be responsible to pay for such batch (the “Defective Product”), and Cardinal Health shall, at Reliant’s option, either (A) replace any Batch of non-conforming Product, or (B) credit any payments made by Reliant for such Batch. If Cardinal Health does not agree with Reliant’s determination that such Product fails to meet the warranty set forth in Section 13.1, then after reasonable efforts to resolve the disagreement, the Parties shall cause a mutually acceptable independent third party to review records, test data and to perform comparative tests and/or analyses on the Manufacturing Sample. The results of the independent review shall be final and binding. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties in writing, the costs associated with such testing and review shall be borne by the non-prevailing Party. THE OBLIGATION OF CARDINAL HEALTH TO (A) REPLACE DEFECTIVE PRODUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OR CREDIT PAYMENTS MADE BY RELIANT FOR DEFECTIVE PRODUCT AND (B) REIMBURSE RELIANT FOR API LOST IN THE DEFECTIVE BATCH, SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS IN ARTICLE 15.1, SHALL BE RELIANT’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY (WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS UNDER SECTION 14.1 OR THE OBLIGATIONS OF SECTION 10.6 (RECALL)) UNDER THIS ARTICLE FOR DEFECTIVE PRODUCT AND IS IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.

  • Maintenance and Support Services Distributor shall provide Maintenance and Support Services to all of its Customers of Licensed Software as set forth in Sections 3.4(a) and 3.4(b) below. Distributor may require Customers to provide the own First-Line Support: however, in no event shall Siebel be responsible for First-Line or Second-Line Support. Subject to Distributor's payment of the Maintenance Fees set forth in EXHIBIT A Siebel shall provide Third-Line Support to Distributor in accordance with Siebel's then current Maintenance and Support Services Policy. Distributor shall be responsible for all support related to the Value Added Offering.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.