Impact After Implementation of Mitigation Measures Sample Clauses

Impact After Implementation of Mitigation Measures. Except as otherwise stated in these Findings, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15092, the Board of Directors finds that environmental effects of the Project modifications will not be significant or will be mitigated to a less than significant level by the adopted mitigation measures. SBFCA has substantially lessened or eliminated all significant environmental effects where feasible. The Board of Directors has determined that any remaining significant effects on the environment that are found to be unavoidable under CEQA Guidelines §15091 are acceptable due to overriding considerations as described in CEQA Guidelines §15093. These overriding considerations consist of specific environmental, economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the Project modifications, which justify approval of the Project modifications and outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects of the Project, as more fully stated in Section VIII (Statement of Overriding Considerations). Except as otherwise stated in these Findings, the Board of Directors finds that the mitigation measures incorporated into and imposed upon the Project modifications will not have new significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the Draft SEIR.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Impact After Implementation of Mitigation Measures

  • Mitigation Measures Company shall take commercially reasonable measures (except measures causing it to incur out-of-pocket expenses which BNYM does not agree in advance to reimburse) to mitigate losses or potential losses to BNYM, including taking verification, validation and reconciliation measures that are commercially reasonable or standard practice in the Company’s business.

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Implementation of Agreement Each Party must promptly execute all documents and do all such acts and things as is necessary or desirable to implement and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD:

  • COOPERATION IN IMPLEMENTATION On demand of the other Spouse and without undue delay or expense, each Spouse shall execute, acknowledge, or deliver any instrument, furnish any information, or perform any other acts reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. If a Spouse fails to execute any document as required by this provision, the court may appoint the court clerk or his or her authorized designee to execute the document on that Xxxxxx’s behalf.

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • CORRECTIVE MEASURE The contractor shall repair any deficiencies in excess of the performance guideline.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Allocation and use of scarce resources Any procedures for the allocation and use of scarce resources, including frequencies, numbers and rights of way, will be carried out in an objective, timely, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. The current state of allocated frequency bands will be made publicly available, but detailed identification of frequencies allocated for specific government uses is not required.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.