Summary of Findings Sample Clauses

Summary of Findings. This section should include findings for historic properties identified in the APE, and for any non- eligible properties for which SHPO concurrence on ineligibility is needed early in the environmental process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Findings a. This section should include The Authority’s findings for any archaeological properties evaluated and determined not eligible for the NRHP for which SHPO concurrence is being requested within 30 days of receipt of the ASR. b. For reference, this section should include a summary of those archaeological properties reported to SHPO in the HPSR.
Summary of Findings a. This section should include The Authority’s findings for any non-eligible properties for which SHPO concurrence is requested within 30 days of receipt of the HASR, but which were not submitted in the HPSR. For reference, this section should include a summary of those historic architectural properties reported to SHPO in the HPSR.
Summary of Findings. The subject property is not currently contiguous to the city limits, but is within the mile-and- a-half extraterritorial jurisdictional area of the City of Urbana.
Summary of Findings e Describe the nature and extent of findings arisen from both sy- stems and substantive testing. (Categorise these findings by refe- rence to their level of importance – «major», «intermediate» and «minor». The list of these findings is shown in the annex to this report). Indicate those errors, which are considered systemic in nature and assess the probability of a possible subsequent quali- fication linked to the errors. Describe and quantify any irregula- rities encountered.
Summary of Findings. The proposed R-3, Single and Two-Family Residential Zoning District would be consistent with the current land use of the subject parcel and surrounding properties.
Summary of Findings. > Describe the nature and extent of findings arisen from both systems and. substantive testing. (Categorise these findings by reference to their level* of importance - "major"," intermediate" and "minor". The list of these findings is shown in the annex to this report). Indicate those errors, which are considered systemic in nature and assess the probability of a possible subsequent qualification linked to the errors. Describe and quantify any irregularities encountered..
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Findings. On July 8, 2004 the Urbana Plan Commission made the following findings in relation to the proposed annexation agreement and rezoning.
Summary of Findings. In summary, we developed econometric models and analyzed travelers’ mobility choice behavior in different aspects: long-term AV adoption, mid-term mobility option, and short-term mode choice at trip level. Models' results and discussions were provided for each aspect in the previous sections. Here we highlight the major findings. AV Adoption and WTP The survey results revealed that the majority of the respondents were either willing to maintain basic vehicle utilization (36%) or at most add some advanced features (37%) such as adaptive cruise control. Only 12% of the respondents expected themselves to be riding in a fully autonomous vehicle in the next ten years. The average WTP increased along with the level of adoption, ranging from $652 for basic vehicles to $1,192 for advanced features, $1,542 for partial automation, and $1,769 for fully automated alternatives. In terms of the role of attitudes, those who enjoy driving would be the hardest to persuade toward AV adoption or to pay for automated features. Technology-savvy people showed a higher tendency toward AV adoption. People showed a higher willingness to pay for automated features if they believe that these features provide them better utility, in terms of time and cost saving, convenience, etc. Individuals with trust issues also showed higher WTP, which might indicate that strategies or services that address privacy issues may be worthwhile even at a higher cost for some group of users. In terms of demographic variables, individuals 55-59 years old, high school graduates, low- income groups (< $50k), and those with driver’s license were less likely to adopt partial or fully AVs, compared to their counterparts. Full-time students, self-employed individuals, Black Americans, frequent online shoppers and those who already experienced ride-sharing options were willing to pay more for AV technologies.
Summary of Findings. Key findings with respect to each of the preceding tasks will be presented to summarize the existing financial conditions of JWA, key comparative metrics identified in benchmarking process, and results of the financial plan developed for each GA facility/development.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!