Inputs to the plan Sample Clauses

Inputs to the plan. 2.2.1. How this plan was developed The development of this plan was progressed through a series of five stages.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Inputs to the plan

  • SEB Plan The parties agree to establish and administer a Supplemental Employment Benefits Plan (the “Plan”) as follows:

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Monitoring Plan keep up with the objectives from the cadetship practice booklet; taking daily notes as well as learning new information every day; currently reporting to the supervisor. Evaluation plan: the final result should be in accordance with the traineeship’s aims and objectives, achieving an improvement of specialty knowledge and language skills. The level of language competence9 in English that the trainee already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the mobility period is: A1 ☐ A2 ☐ B1 ☐ B2 ☒ C1 ☐ C2 ☐ Native speaker ☐ Table B - Sending Institution Please use only one of the following three boxes: 10 The traineeship is embedded in the curriculum and upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to:Award ……...…ECTS credits (or equivalent)11 Give a grade based on: Traineeship certificate ☒ Final report ☒ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records and Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☒ No ☐ The traineeship is voluntary and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Give a grade: Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate if this will be based on: Traineeship certificate ☐ Final report ☐ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records: Yes ☐ No ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☐ No ☐ The traineeship is carried out by a recent graduate and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document (highly recommended): Yes ☐ No ☐ Accident insurance for the trainee The Sending Institution will provide an accident insurance to the trainee (if not provided by the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise): Yes ☐ No ☒ The accident insurance covers: - accidents during travels made for work purposes: Yes ☐ No ☒ - accidents on the way to work and back from work: Yes ☐ No ☒

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopts or introduces for the Employer, management and municipal staff of the Employer.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Mentoring Program It is recognized that the induction of new teachers through a formalized mentoring program will help to promote excellence in teaching and improve student achievement. The focus of this program will be to build a supportive environment for new teachers within the context of school improvement. Veteran teachers may be asked or encouraged to mentor a new staff member but will not be required to do so. Mentors will be compensated for this work N. Moving Classrooms: Employees who are asked to change classrooms or offices will be provided the assistance of district personnel in moving boxes and/or large items.

  • EPP service availability Refers to the ability of the TLD EPP servers as a group, to respond to commands from the Registry accredited Registrars, who already have credentials to the servers. The response shall include appropriate data from the Registry System. An EPP command with “EPP command RTT” 5 times higher than the corresponding SLR will be considered as unanswered. If 51% or more of the EPP testing probes see the EPP service as unavailable during a given time, the EPP service will be considered unavailable.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Requirements.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.