Common use of Interagency Consultation Procedures Clause in Contracts

Interagency Consultation Procedures. The issues listed in 40 CFR 93.105(c) shall be reviewed and discussed at this meeting, including but not limited to, the following activities: 6.3.1.1 Evaluating and choosing an appropriate model (or models) and associated methods and assumptions to be used in hot-spot analyses and regional emissions analyses; 6.3.1.2 Determining which minor arterial and other transportation projects should be considered RSPs for the purpose of regional emissions analysis, (in addition to those functionally classified as principal arterials or higher or fixed guideway systems or extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travel); 6.3.1.3 Evaluating whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127 should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist; 6.3.1.4 Discussing whether or not adopted TCMs are on schedule and performing as anticipated, as required by 40 CFR 93.113. If TCMs are not on schedule, Parties shall discuss whether 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) can be met and what will occur if 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) cannot be met; 6.3.1.5 Choosing conformity tests and methodologies for areas outside the MPO boundary but within the nonattainment or maintenance area as required by 93.109(g)(2)(iii); 6.3.1.6 Consulting on emissions analysis for transportation activities which cross MPO, nonattainment area, or air basin boundaries; 6.3.1.7 For the metropolitan planning area that does not include the entire nonattainment or maintenance area, the MPO and NCDOT will work to provide cooperative planning and analysis for the purposes of determining conformity of all projects outside the metropolitan area and within the nonattainment or maintenance area through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.8 Ensuring that plans for construction of RSPs, that are not FHWA/FTA projects, are disclosed to the MPO on a regular basis and any changes to those plans disclosed in writing to the MPO; 6.3.1.9 NCDOT and the MPO, or its designee, will consult on the design, schedule and funding of research and data collection efforts and regional transportation model development through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.10 As defined in Section 2.1.10, the MPO, or its designee will provide final documents and supporting information to each applicable Party after adoption or approval; 6.3.1.11 Latest planning assumptions for developing emissions modeling results for the conformity analysis; 6.3.1.12 Projects without a determined design concept and scope shall be discussed at the Interagency Consultation Conformity Determination Meeting; and 6.3.1.13 Parties must agree on sufficient details of the design concept and scope for the project to be included in the conformity analysis and determination.

Appears in 6 contracts

Samples: Memorandum of Agreement, Memorandum of Agreement, Memorandum of Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Interagency Consultation Procedures. The issues listed in 40 CFR 93.105(c) shall be reviewed and discussed at this meeting, including but not limited to, the following activities: 6.3.1.1 Evaluating and choosing an appropriate model (or models) and associated methods and assumptions to be used in hot-hot- spot analyses and regional emissions analyses; 6.3.1.2 Determining which minor arterial and other transportation projects should be considered RSPs for the purpose of regional emissions analysis, (in addition to those functionally classified as principal arterials or higher or fixed guideway systems or extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travel); 6.3.1.3 Evaluating whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127 should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist; 6.3.1.4 Discussing whether or not adopted TCMs are on schedule and performing as anticipated, as required by 40 CFR 93.113. If TCMs are not on schedule, Parties shall discuss whether 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) can be met and what will occur if 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) cannot be met; 6.3.1.5 Choosing conformity tests and methodologies for areas outside the MPO boundary but within the nonattainment or maintenance area as required by 93.109(g)(2)(iii); 6.3.1.6 Consulting on emissions analysis for transportation activities which cross MPO, nonattainment area, or air basin boundaries; 6.3.1.7 For the metropolitan planning area that does not include the entire nonattainment or maintenance area, the MPO and NCDOT will work to provide cooperative planning and analysis for the purposes of determining conformity of all projects outside the metropolitan area and within the nonattainment or maintenance area through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.8 Ensuring that plans for construction of RSPs, that are not FHWA/FTA projects, are disclosed to the MPO on a regular basis and any changes to those plans disclosed in writing to the MPO; 6.3.1.9 NCDOT and the MPO, or its designee, will consult on the design, schedule and funding of research and data collection efforts and regional transportation model development through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.10 As defined in Section 2.1.10, the MPO, or its designee will provide final documents and supporting information to each applicable Party after adoption or approval; 6.3.1.11 Latest planning assumptions for developing emissions modeling results for the conformity analysis; 6.3.1.12 Projects without a determined design concept and scope shall be discussed at the Interagency Consultation Conformity Determination Meeting; and 6.3.1.13 Parties must agree on sufficient details of the design concept and scope for the project to be included in the conformity analysis and determination.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Memorandum of Agreement

Interagency Consultation Procedures. The issues listed in 40 CFR 93.105(c93.105 (c)93.105(c) shall be reviewed and discussed at this meeting, including but not limited to, the following activities: 6.3.1.1 Evaluating and choosing an appropriate model (or models) and associated methods and assumptions to be used in hot-spot analyses and regional emissions analyses; 6.3.1.2 Determining which minor arterial and other transportation projects should be considered RSPs Regionally Significant ProjectsRSPs for the purpose of regional emissions analysis analysis, (in addition to those functionally classified as principal arterials or higher or fixed guideway systems or extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travel); 6.3.1.3 Evaluating whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127 should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist; 6.3.1.4 Discussing whether or not adopted TCMs are on schedule and performing as anticipated, as required by 40 CFR 93.113. If TCMs are not on schedule, Parties shall discuss whether 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) can be met and what will occur if 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) cannot be met; 6.3.1.5 Choosing conformity tests and methodologies for areas outside the MPO boundary but within the nonattainment or maintenance area as required by 93.109(g)(2)(iii93.109(l)(2)(iii);93.109(g)(2)(iii); 6.3.1.6 Consulting on emissions analysis for transportation activities which cross MPO, nonattainment area area, or air basin boundaries; 6.3.1.7 For the metropolitan planning area that does not include the entire nonattainment or maintenance area, the MPO and NCDOT will work to provide cooperative planning and analysis for the purposes of determining conformity of all projects outside the metropolitan area and within the nonattainment or maintenance area through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.8 Ensuring that plans for construction of RSPs, that are not FHWA/FTA projects, are disclosed to the MPO on a regular basis and any changes to those plans disclosed in writing to the MPO; 6.3.1.9 NCDOT and the MPO, or its designee, will consult on the design, schedule and funding of research and data collection efforts and regional transportation model development through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.10 As defined in Section 2.1.10, the MPO, or its designee will provide final documents and supporting information to each applicable Party after adoption or approval; 6.3.1.11 Latest planning assumptions for developing emissions emission factorsemissions modeling results for the conformity analysis; 6.3.1.12 Projects without a determined design concept and scope shall be discussed at the Interagency Consultation Consultation;Consultation Conformity Determination Meeting; and 6.3.1.13 Parties must agree on sufficient details of the design concept and scope for the project to be included in the conformity analysis and determination.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Memorandum of Agreement

Interagency Consultation Procedures. The issues listed in 40 CFR 93.105(c) shall be reviewed and discussed at this meeting, including but not limited to, the following activities: 6.3.1.1 3.2.2.1 Evaluating and choosing an appropriate model tool (or modelstools) and associated methods and assumptions to be used in hot-spot analyses and regional emissions analyses; 6.3.1.2 3.2.2.2 Determining which minor arterial and other transportation projects should be considered RSPs for the purpose of regional emissions analysis, Regionally Significant Projects (in addition to those functionally classified as principal arterials or higher or fixed guideway systems or extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travelRSPs); 6.3.1.3 3.2.2.3 Evaluating whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127 should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist; 6.3.1.4 3.2.2.4 Discussing whether or not adopted TCMs are on schedule and performing as anticipated, as required by 40 CFR 93.113. If TCMs are not on schedule, Parties shall discuss whether 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) can be met and what will occur if 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) cannot be met; 6.3.1.5 3.2.2.5 Choosing conformity tests and methodologies for isolated rural nonattainment and maintenance areas outside the MPO boundary but within the nonattainment or maintenance area as required by 93.109(g)(2)(iii);. 6.3.1.6 3.2.2.6 Consulting on emissions analysis for transportation activities which cross MPOcounty and/or NPS, nonattainment area, or air basin boundaries; 6.3.1.7 For the metropolitan planning area that does not include the entire nonattainment or maintenance area, the MPO and NCDOT will work to provide cooperative planning and analysis for the purposes of determining conformity of all projects outside the metropolitan area and within the nonattainment or maintenance area through interagency consultation meetings; 6.3.1.8 3.2.2.7 Ensuring that plans for construction of RSPs, that are not FHWA-EFLHD/FTA projects, are disclosed to the MPO NCDOT on a regular basis and any changes to those plans disclosed in writing to the MPONCDOT; 6.3.1.9 NCDOT and the MPO, or its designee, will consult 3.2.2.8 Process for consulting on the design, schedule and schedule, funding of research and data collection efforts efforts, and regional transportation model tool development through interagency consultation meetingsby NCDOT; 6.3.1.10 As defined in Section 2.1.10, the MPO, or its designee will provide 3.2.2.9 Process for providing final documents and supporting information to each applicable Party after adoption or approvalapproval as defined in Section 2.1.10; 6.3.1.11 3.2.2.10 Latest planning assumptions for developing emissions modeling results emission factors for the conformity analysis; 6.3.1.12 3.2.2.11 Projects without a determined design concept and scope shall be discussed at the Interagency Consultation Conformity Determination MeetingConsultation; and 6.3.1.13 3.2.2.12 Parties must agree on sufficient details of the design concept and scope for the project to be included in the conformity analysis and determination.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Memorandum of Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Interagency Consultation Procedures. The issues listed in 40 CFR 93.105(c) shall be reviewed and discussed at this meeting, including but not limited to, the following activities: 6.3.1.1 Evaluating and choosing an appropriate model (or models) and associated methods and assumptions to be used in hot-spot analyses and regional emissions analyses; 6.3.1.2 Determining which minor arterial and other transportation projects should be considered RSPs for the purpose of regional emissions analysis, Regionally Significant Projects (in addition to those functionally classified as principal arterials or higher or fixed guideway systems or extensions that offer an alternative to regional highway travelRSPs); 6.3.1.3 Evaluating whether projects otherwise exempted from meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 93.126 and 93.127 should be treated as non-exempt in cases where potential adverse emissions impacts may exist; 6.3.1.4 Discussing whether or not adopted TCMs are on schedule and performing as anticipated, as required by 40 CFR 93.113. If TCMs are not on schedule, Parties shall discuss whether 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) can be met and what will occur if 40 CFR 93.113(c)(1) cannot be met; 6.3.1.5 Choosing conformity tests and methodologies for areas outside the MPO boundary but within the nonattainment or maintenance area as required by 93.109(g)(2)(iii); 6.3.1.6 Consulting on emissions analysis for transportation activities which cross MPO, nonattainment area, or air basin boundaries; 6.3.1.7 For the metropolitan planning area that does not include the entire nonattainment or maintenance area, establish a process involving the MPO and NCDOT will work to provide for cooperative planning and analysis for the purposes of determining conformity of all projects outside the metropolitan area and within the nonattainment or maintenance area through interagency consultation meetingsarea; 6.3.1.8 Ensuring that plans for construction of RSPs, that are not FHWA/FTA projects, are disclosed to the MPO NCDOT on a regular basis and any changes to those plans disclosed in writing to the MPONCDOT; 6.3.1.9 NCDOT and the MPO, or its designee, will consult Process for consulting on the design, schedule schedule, and funding of research and research, data collection efforts efforts, and regional transportation model development through interagency consultation meetingsby the NCDOT; 6.3.1.10 As defined in Section 2.1.10, the MPO, or its designee will provide Process for providing final documents and supporting information to each applicable Party after adoption or approvalapproval as defined in Section 2.1.10; 6.3.1.11 Latest planning assumptions for developing emissions modeling results for the conformity analysis; 6.3.1.12 Projects without a determined design concept and scope shall be discussed at the Interagency Consultation Conformity Determination Meeting; and 6.3.1.13 Parties must agree on sufficient details of the design concept and scope for the project to be included in the conformity analysis and determination.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Memorandum of Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!