Selection Procedures. In selecting the Loan Assets to be Pledged pursuant to this Agreement, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of the Lenders.
Selection Procedures. In selecting the Collateral Obligations hereunder and for Affiliates of the Borrower, no selection procedures were employed which are intended to be adverse to the interests of any Agent or Lender.
Selection Procedures. No selection procedures believed by the Seller to be adverse to the Noteholders were utilized in selecting the Receivables from the Seller’s portfolio of retail installment sale contracts.
Selection Procedures. The project evaluation and award of grants shall be in accordance with Article 7.4
Selection Procedures. No procedures believed by the Borrower to be materially adverse to the interests of the Secured Parties were utilized by the Borrower in identifying and/or selecting the Loans that are part of the Collateral.
Selection Procedures. No selection procedures believed by the Seller to be adverse to the interests of the Beneficiaries were utilized in selecting the Additional Accounts designated hereby;
Selection Procedures. The Sponsor did not use selection procedures believed to be adverse to the Noteholders in selecting the Receivables from its portfolio of retail installment sale contracts.
Selection Procedures. No selection procedures believed by the Bank to be materially adverse to the interests of the Investor Certificateholders were utilized in selecting the Removed Accounts designated hereby.
Selection Procedures. No selection procedures believed by the Transferor to be materially adverse to the interests of the Investor Certificateholders were utilized in selecting the Removed Accounts designated hereby.
Selection Procedures. (a) Appointments to and from within the Justice Institute will be based on applying the principle of merit. The matters to be considered in determining merit shall, having regard to the nature of the duties to be performed, include the applicant's education, skills, knowledge, experience, past work performance and years of continuous service at the Justice Institute.
(b) The initial assessment of applicants shall be a process which appraises knowledge, skills and abilities of eligible applicants. The weighting of these factors shall be consistently applied within job types within a classification, which have been evaluated under the selection standards project. If the highest rated qualified applicant has the most years of continuous service, this applicant shall be appointed.
(c) If the highest rated qualified applicant is not the applicant with the most years of continuous service the selection panel will determine which qualified applicants, if any, are relatively equal to this applicant. The qualified applicant who is relatively equal with the most years of continuous service shall be appointed.
(d) For the purpose of this clause "relatively equal" means candidates with: • ten (10) years or more of continuous service have a point score difference of ten percent (10%) or less of the points available for education, skills, knowledge, experience and past work performance. • less than ten (10) years of continuous service have a point score difference of five percent (5%) or less of the points available for education, skills, knowledge, experience and past work performance.
(e) Where an eligibility list has been established qualified candidates who are relatively equal to the highest ranked successful candidate shall be placed on the eligibility list in order of their years of continuous service. Other qualified candidates shall be placed on the list in order of their respective point scores.
