Interlude Sample Clauses

Interlude. Four-dimensional N = 1 SYM theories In this interlude, we review primary features of pure supersymmetric Xxxx-Xxxxx (SYM) theories in four dimensions with four supercharges, i.e. N = 1, and gauge group G = SU(N ). In the discussion below, we closely follow [106]. The pure SYM theory shares interesting properties from pure non-supersymmetric Xxxx-Xxxxx (YM) theories and quantum chromodynamics (QCD). From YM theories, SYM inherits confinement, i.e. flux tube, mass gap. While it inherits chiral symmetry breaking from QCD. The classical SYM theory is defined through the following action [106] SY M 16π i α α S [A, λ, D] = 1 ż d4x ż d2θ τ WaWa . h.c.) 4g2 = ż d4x [— 1 Fa Fµν a — θY M Fa Frµν a (3.39) µν 32π2 µν . i λa :σµD λa . 1 DaDa.] Here, g2 µ 2g2 Wa = —iλa . θα Da . i(σµνθ)α Fa . θθ(σµDµλa :)α, α α θY M 4π µν

Interlude. Yet, understanding ḥēremic war in terms of the North Korean threats is not the initial commandment of םרח in Deuteronomy 7 and 20, and the inconsistent results in the conquest narrative in Xxxxxx and Judges; he also did not introduce various thoughts about the conquest narratives and its historical, literary, and redactional contexts in history of biblical scholarship. See Kang, “The Military Leader and Leadership in the Old Testament,” 126–150. only aspect. Along with the active introduction of biblical scholarship, the Korean Church realized and understood the existence of multiple dimensions of the text of םרח. From the beginning of the twenty-first century, most sermons and homiletic interpretations about םרח have exposed another way of reading: revealing allegorical and typological interpretations, like Origen (§ V. A), and emblematic interpretations—reforming religious piety—for which the Deuteronomic Historian aims (§ IV. A. B.).151 Therefore confronting “a large-scale massacre of an enemy…[which] causes gnashing of teeth, chills of the spine, and head-scratching bewilderment to many readers of the Bible,”152 the Korean Church had gradually formed some consensus on the reception of the םרח texts: םרח, as a symbol, denotes a spiritual war in the religious lives of believers,153 What Origen mentioned, “the Canaanites, Perizzites, and Jebusites. Where are they? These tribes and the following conflicts are within us!”154 has been a foundation of this way of reading in the Korean Church. This tendency of reading is not only a convenient way of avoiding the cruel images in the Hebrew Bible, but also a good chance for converting problematic texts and concepts to didactic resources for sermons. In the actual field of the Korean Church ministries, however, some of the symbolic understandings of the םרח texts (i.e., םרח as a symbol of spiritual war) has developed into a somewhat excessive or even arbitrary reading and caused practical actions. The case of “circling” Bong-Eun Sa155 in 2010 was 151 Xxxxxxxxxxx, Deuteronomy 1:1–21:9, lxviii–lxix; Tigay, Deuteronomy, xxiii–xxiv. 152 Xxxxx, The Biblical Ḥērem, ix. 153 Here are some representative sermon lists: Yeom Huiseon, “Remember the Way of Holy People” (Good Shepherd Methodist Church, 2011); Hwang Gyugwan, “Destroying the Amalekites Again” (Harim Church, 2013); Xxx Xxxxxxxx, “The Meaning of Ḥērem war in Canaanites” (The Lord Presbyterian Church, 2012). Their interpretations also reveal the message of inner-sp...