Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (KL) Iino Building, 0-0-0 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx-xx Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd including each proposed extension of an Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd.; Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; Pacific International Lines (PTE) Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Maersk Line A/S; Willenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Iino Xxxxxxxx 0-0, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0-Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx-xx Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx (hereafter “"K” LINE") ("K" LINE and GLOVIS may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties")
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd as parties to the Agreement. In addition, the Amendment reflects changes to the names and/or addresses of American President Lines, LLC; Hapag-Xxxxx USA; HMM Company Limited; APM Terminals Pacific LLC; Fenix Marine Services, Ltd.; International Transportation Service LLC; LBCT LLC dba Long Beach Container Terminal LLC; Total Terminals International LLC; SSA (Pier A), LLC; Trapac LLC; and Yusen Terminals LLC.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Maersk Line A/S; MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.;
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Xxxx Xxxx (UK) Ltd.; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; and the Evergreen Line Joint Service Agreement.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd parties to a contract may incorporate in it provisions which [30] As previously noted, counsel for the plaintiff (relying on the passage in Xxxxx’x Law of Contract) submitted that strict compliance with the terms of the notice is required for there to be a valid determination.
x. Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx (The Afovos) [1983] 1 WLR 195). In the latter case, a termination notice was issued at 16:40 p.m. for failure to provide “punctual payment” under the terms of a charter party agreement, as the ship owners thought it impractical for the charterers to pay the instalment after that time, although payment was not due until midnight on the same day. The House of Lords held that the notice purporting to terminate the contract was invalid, as the owner had issued the notice early. [32] Similar statements as to the strict application of the contract’s procedural requirements for termination pursuant to an ETC are also to be found in Chitty on Contracts, considered by many to be the pre-eminent textbook on the law of contract. For example, in the 27th ed. of the work (published 1994) is to be found the following statement [at 22:046]: [33] I set out in xxxxxx form the statement of the proposition as it appears in the 33rd ed. of Xxxxxx (published 2018) [at 22-051]:
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (“KL”) 0-0, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0-Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx-xx, Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx
