Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (KL) Iino Building, 0-0-0 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx-xx Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd including each proposed extension of an Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd.; Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; Pacific International Lines (PTE) Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Maersk Line A/S; Willenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Iino Xxxxxxxx 0-0, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0-Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx-xx Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx (hereafter “"K” LINE") ("K" LINE and GLOVIS may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties") Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5" Formatted: No underline
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Nippon Yusen the one hand, and Italy and Spain on the other hand. Agreement No.: 201157–006. Title: USMX–XXX Master Contract between United States Maritime Alliance, Ltd. and International Longshoremen’s Association. Parties: United States Maritime Alliance, Ltd., on behalf of Management, and the International Longshoremen’s Association, AFL–CIO.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Maersk Line A/S; MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.;
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Iino Xxxxxxxx 0-0, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 0-Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx-xx Xxxxx 000-0000, Xxxxx (hereafter "K LINE") ("K" LINE and GLOVIS may be individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties")
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. Xxxx Xxxx (UK) Ltd.; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; and the Evergreen Line Joint Service Agreement.
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd parties to a contract may incorporate in it provisions which expressly define the events, whether or not they amount to breaches of contract, which are to have this effect. But such a provision may do no more than define an event which of itself, or at the option of one or other of the parties, brings the contract to an end and thus relieves both parties from their undertakings further to perform their obligations thereunder. Whether it does more than this and confers any other rights or remedies on either party on the termination of the contract, depends on the true construction of the relevant provisions. If it does not, then each party is left with such causes of action, if any, as has already accrued to him at the date that the contract came to an end, but acquires no fresh cause of action as a result of the termination. If it does purport to confer on one of the parties a right to recover a sum of money from the other, a question may arise whether this right is unenforceable as constituting a penalty.” [30] As previously noted, counsel for the plaintiff (relying on the passage in Xxxxx’x Law of Contract) submitted that strict compliance with the terms of the notice is required for there to be a valid determination.
