Common use of Layered Responsibilities for Review Clause in Contracts

Layered Responsibilities for Review. 7.3.1 RPT recommendations and the length of each reappointment shall be initiated by the academic unit based upon criteria and procedures developed by the members of the academic unit. These recommendations shall be forwarded by the academic unit head to the College RPT Committee (or equivalent committee or Xxxx); from the College RPT Committee, or equivalent committee, to the Xxxx or appropriate administrator; and from the Xxxx or administrator to the Xxxxxxx. At each level, the review committee or administrator shall assess the sufficiency of the dossier and the conformity of the review process to established criteria and procedures and may remand the dossier to a previous level of review for appropriate action. 7.3.2 Each academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction shall publish the responsibilities of the academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction and the responsibilities of the candidate for developing dossiers. The academic unit head, Xxxx, or administrator, as appropriate, shall be responsible for initiating and completing in sufficient time those parts of a candidate's dossier required by the RPT procedures and criteria (e.g., external reviews, administrative summaries of teaching evaluation, etc.) for which the candidate is not responsible to ensure a timely and fair evaluation of the candidate. 7.3.3 The dossier shall include evidence and evaluation of the candidate's qualifications as well as any other information or documentation deemed pertinent. This information and documentation shall be provided to: the academic unit RPT committee; the college RPT committee; or the librarians' RPT committee by the date specified by the appropriate committee. 7.3.4 For the Department of Biomedical Engineering, the academic unit shall initiate RPT recommendations. The academic unit head shall forward these recommendations to the combined Ad Hoc Biomedical RPT Committee of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering that will be comprised of three (3) members of the College of Medicine RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Medicine RPT Committee and three (3) members of the College of Engineering RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Engineering RPT Committee. The combined Committee will make recommendations to the Deans of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering, who will make recommendations to the Provosts for Health Affairs and for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education. The Deans and the Provosts will rotate responsibilities for RPT on a yearly basis as follows: in even-numbered years, the Xxxx of the College of Engineering and the Xxxxxxx for Health Affairs will make all decisions regarding tenure and promotion to the rank of Professor, and the Xxxx of the College of Medicine and the Xxxxxxx for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education will make all other RPT decisions as necessary. These roles will be reversed in odd-numbered years.

Layered Responsibilities for Review. 7.3.1 RPT recommendations and the length of each reappointment shall be initiated by the academic unit based upon criteria and procedures developed by the members of the academic unit. These recommendations shall be forwarded by the academic unit head to the College RPT Committee (or equivalent committee or Xxxx); from the College RPT Committee, or equivalent committee, to the Xxxx or appropriate administrator; and from the Xxxx or administrator to the Xxxxxxx. At each level, the review committee or administrator shall assess the sufficiency of the dossier and the conformity of the review process to established criteria and procedures and may remand the dossier to a previous level of review for appropriate action. 7.3.2 Each academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction shall publish the responsibilities of the academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction and the responsibilities of the candidate for developing dossiers. The academic unit head, Xxxx, or administrator, as appropriate, shall be responsible for initiating and completing in sufficient time those parts of a candidate's dossier required by the RPT procedures and criteria (e.g., external reviews, administrative summaries of teaching evaluation, etc.) for which the candidate is not responsible to ensure a timely and fair evaluation of the candidate. 7.3.3 The dossier shall include evidence and evaluation of the candidate's qualifications as well as any other information or documentation deemed pertinent. This information and documentation shall be provided to: the academic unit RPT committee; the college RPT committee; or the librarians' RPT committee by the date specified by the appropriate committee. 7.3.4 For the Department of Biomedical Engineering, the academic unit shall initiate RPT recommendations. The academic unit head shall forward these recommendations to the combined Ad Hoc Biomedical RPT Committee of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering that will be comprised of three (3) members of the College of Medicine RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Medicine RPT Committee and three (3) members of the College of Engineering RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Engineering RPT Committee. The combined Committee will make recommendations to the Deans of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering, who will make recommendations to the Provosts for Health Affairs and for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education. The Deans and the Provosts will rotate responsibilities for RPT on a yearly basis as follows: in even-numbered years, the Xxxx of the College of Engineering and the Xxxxxxx for Health Affairs will make all decisions regarding tenure and promotion to the rank of Professorprofessor, and the Xxxx of the College of Medicine and the Xxxxxxx for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education will make all other RPT decisions as necessary. These roles will be reversed in odd-numbered years.

Layered Responsibilities for Review. 7.3.1 RPT recommendations and the length of each reappointment shall be initiated by the academic unit based upon criteria and procedures developed by the members of the academic unit. These recommendations shall be forwarded by the academic unit head to the College RPT Committee (or equivalent committee or Xxxx); from the College RPT Committee, or equivalent committee, to the Xxxx or appropriate administrator; and from the Xxxx or administrator to the Xxxxxxx. At each level, the review committee or administrator shall assess the sufficiency of the dossier and the conformity of the review process to established criteria and procedures and may remand the dossier to a previous level of review for appropriate action. 7.3.2 Each academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction shall publish the responsibilities of the academic unit, college, or library jurisdiction and the responsibilities of the candidate for developing dossiers. The academic unit head, Xxxx, or administrator, as appropriate, shall be responsible for initiating and completing in sufficient time those parts of a candidate's dossier required by the RPT procedures and criteria (e.g., external reviews, administrative summaries of teaching evaluation, etc.) for which the candidate is not responsible to ensure a timely and fair evaluation of the candidate. 7.3.3 The dossier shall include evidence and evaluation of the candidate's qualifications as well as any other information or documentation deemed pertinent. This information and documentation shall be provided to: the academic unit RPT committee; the college RPT committee; or the librarians' RPT committee by the date specified by the appropriate committee. 7.3.4 For the Department of Biomedical Engineering, the academic unit shall initiate RPT recommendations. The academic unit head shall forward these recommendations to the combined Ad Hoc Biomedical RPT Committee of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering that will be comprised of three (3) members of the College of Medicine RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Medicine RPT Committee and three (3) members of the College of Engineering RPT Committee selected by the Chair of the College of Engineering RPT Committee. The combined Committee will make recommendations to the Deans of the Colleges of Medicine and Engineering, who will make recommendations to the Provosts for Health Affairs and for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education. The Deans and the Provosts will rotate responsibilities for RPT on a yearly basis as follows: in even-numbered years, the Xxxx of the College of Engineering and the Xxxxxxx for Health Affairs will make all decisions regarding tenure and promotion to the rank of Professor, and the Xxxx of the College of Medicine and the Xxxxxxx for Baccalaureate and Graduate Education will make all other RPT decisions as necessary. These roles will be reversed in odd-numbered years.the